Bibliogr. s. 192-193. Publ. jest odpowiedzią na art. J. Don i J. Wojewodę opublikowany w tym samym nr czasopisma

The paper aims to answer the critical remarks presented by Don and Wojewoda (in this issue) related to our papers published in Acta Montana (Badura et al., 2002, Badura et al., 2003). Answering those we have noticed that the terms brachysyncline and brachyanticline are improper with regard to the young Alpine rebuilding of the Upper Nysa Kłodzka Graben. In this paper we present the basic reasons for our hypothesis of young tectonic movements in the studied area more widely. Our morphotectonic analyses are based on the digital elevation models (DEM) and the electroresistance survey of the researched area located near Kamienna and north of Długopole Zdrój. The results of our research show that despite of the long history of the geological studies - longer than 100 years, the region is still a very challenging research area. In this paper we point out that application of the DEM and electroresistivity methods gives the new important results. Those should definitely be taken into consideration together with palaeontological research and geological mapping. We really wonder that the authors of the critical paper unequivocally negate the results of our studies and suggest that the continuation of such research and geodetic survey in the area is aimless.