(Re)thinking the international labour law : international labour standards, regulatory strategy and universality

2022
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enIn 2020, for the first time in the history of the International Labour Organization (ILO), we sighted the universal ratification of a Convention, that is, the ratification by all 187 Member States of the Organization. The C182-Convention of Worst Forms of Child Labour (1999) is identified as a fundamental Convention because it refers to one of the fundamental labour rights identified at ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998). This Declaration, despite having been immersed in intense debates on the regulatory option adopted by the ILO (soft law), spelled out a list of fundamental rights and principles at work, approaching to the grammar of human rights. In this sense, it is possible to understand that Convention  No.  182, since it is fundamental, already had a  prominent role. However, universal ratification presents itself as opportune and strategic, especially when it formalizes the commitment of States to the observance of the parameters presented in the respective international labour standard. Thus, using the deductive method (Lakatos, Marconi 2003) and the bibliographic and the documentary research techniques, the study is going to analyse the importance of universalizing international labour standards for International Labour Law.pl
dc.contributor.authorde Quintana Figueiredo Pasqualeto, Olíviapl
dc.contributor.authorLopes Scodro, Catharinapl
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T07:56:58Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T07:56:58Z
dc.date.issued2022pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 9-10pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical1-10pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume29pl
dc.identifier.doi10.4467/25444654SPP.22.001.15369pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-4654pl
dc.identifier.issn1429-9585pl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/312547
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enInternational Labour Organizationpl
dc.subject.eninternational labour standardspl
dc.subject.enregulatory strategypl
dc.subject.enuniversalitypl
dc.subject.plMiędzynarodowa Organizacja Pracypl
dc.subject.plmiędzynarodowe standardy prawa pracypl
dc.subject.plstrategie regulacyjnepl
dc.subject.plpowszechnośćpl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.title(Re)thinking the international labour law : international labour standards, regulatory strategy and universalitypl
dc.title.journalStudia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznejpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
In 2020, for the first time in the history of the International Labour Organization (ILO), we sighted the universal ratification of a Convention, that is, the ratification by all 187 Member States of the Organization. The C182-Convention of Worst Forms of Child Labour (1999) is identified as a fundamental Convention because it refers to one of the fundamental labour rights identified at ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998). This Declaration, despite having been immersed in intense debates on the regulatory option adopted by the ILO (soft law), spelled out a list of fundamental rights and principles at work, approaching to the grammar of human rights. In this sense, it is possible to understand that Convention  No.  182, since it is fundamental, already had a  prominent role. However, universal ratification presents itself as opportune and strategic, especially when it formalizes the commitment of States to the observance of the parameters presented in the respective international labour standard. Thus, using the deductive method (Lakatos, Marconi 2003) and the bibliographic and the documentary research techniques, the study is going to analyse the importance of universalizing international labour standards for International Labour Law.
dc.contributor.authorpl
de Quintana Figueiredo Pasqualeto, Olívia
dc.contributor.authorpl
Lopes Scodro, Catharina
dc.date.accessioned
2023-06-21T07:56:58Z
dc.date.available
2023-06-21T07:56:58Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2022
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 9-10
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
1-10
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
29
dc.identifier.doipl
10.4467/25444654SPP.22.001.15369
dc.identifier.eissnpl
2544-4654
dc.identifier.issnpl
1429-9585
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/312547
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
International Labour Organization
dc.subject.enpl
international labour standards
dc.subject.enpl
regulatory strategy
dc.subject.enpl
universality
dc.subject.plpl
Międzynarodowa Organizacja Pracy
dc.subject.plpl
międzynarodowe standardy prawa pracy
dc.subject.plpl
strategie regulacyjne
dc.subject.plpl
powszechność
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
(Re)thinking the international labour law : international labour standards, regulatory strategy and universality
dc.title.journalpl
Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
7
Views per month
Views per city
Amman
2
Edegem
1
Krakow
1
San Jose
1
Vacoas
1
Downloads
de-quintana-figueiredo-pasqualeto_lopes-scodro_re_thinking_the_international_labour_law_2022.pdf
32