Modyfikacja tekstu prawnego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego : problem wykładni prawa czy niedozwolona wypowiedź normatywna

2024
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThe subject of the analyses contained in the study is a phenomenon that raises fundamental controversies in the context of the principle of the tripartite division of powers in Poland, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of certainty of legal transactions. It concerns the tendency of judicial modification of the law for the purpose of a specific case being decided. The extreme and most far-reaching manifestation of judicial lawmaking is the modification of a legal text that is directly understood, i.e. one that does not give rise to any, even the slightest, doubts as to its content. In the current state of the law, there is no basis for modifying a legal text in the process of administering justice. Such modification means exceeding the limits of legal interpretation and is an impermissible normative statement. New legal rules may be formed in the activity of jurisprudence, but they must arise on the basis of a resultant relationship, following a process of restorative interpretation and provided that they are generally accepted by the judicature.
dc.contributor.authorPiątkowski, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T09:41:34Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T09:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 40-41
dc.description.number1
dc.description.physical29-41
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume31
dc.identifier.doi10.4467/25444654SPP.24.003.19478
dc.identifier.eissn2544-4654
dc.identifier.issn1429-9585
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/343520
dc.languagepol
dc.language.containerpol
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enadministration of justice
dc.subject.endirectly understood text
dc.subject.enjudicial lawmaking
dc.subject.enmodification of the law
dc.subject.enadequate application clause
dc.subject.enprinciple of the tripartite division of powers
dc.subject.enprinciple of legal certainty
dc.subject.plwymiar sprawiedliwości
dc.subject.pltekst bezpośrednio rozumiany
dc.subject.plprawotwórstwo sądowe
dc.subject.plmodyfikacja prawa
dc.subject.plklauzula odpowiedniego stosowania prawa
dc.subject.plzasada trójpodziału władz
dc.subject.plzasada pewności prawa
dc.subtypeArticle
dc.titleModyfikacja tekstu prawnego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego : problem wykładni prawa czy niedozwolona wypowiedź normatywna
dc.title.alternativeModification of a legal text in the case law of the Supreme Court : a problem of interpretation of the law or an impermissible normative statement
dc.title.journalStudia z zakresu prawa pracy i polityki społecznej
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
dc.abstract.en
The subject of the analyses contained in the study is a phenomenon that raises fundamental controversies in the context of the principle of the tripartite division of powers in Poland, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of certainty of legal transactions. It concerns the tendency of judicial modification of the law for the purpose of a specific case being decided. The extreme and most far-reaching manifestation of judicial lawmaking is the modification of a legal text that is directly understood, i.e. one that does not give rise to any, even the slightest, doubts as to its content. In the current state of the law, there is no basis for modifying a legal text in the process of administering justice. Such modification means exceeding the limits of legal interpretation and is an impermissible normative statement. New legal rules may be formed in the activity of jurisprudence, but they must arise on the basis of a resultant relationship, following a process of restorative interpretation and provided that they are generally accepted by the judicature.
dc.contributor.author
Piątkowski, Jan
dc.date.accessioned
2024-05-29T09:41:34Z
dc.date.available
2024-05-29T09:41:34Z
dc.date.issued
2024
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additional
Bibliogr. s. 40-41
dc.description.number
1
dc.description.physical
29-41
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume
31
dc.identifier.doi
10.4467/25444654SPP.24.003.19478
dc.identifier.eissn
2544-4654
dc.identifier.issn
1429-9585
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/343520
dc.language
pol
dc.language.container
pol
dc.rights
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.en
administration of justice
dc.subject.en
directly understood text
dc.subject.en
judicial lawmaking
dc.subject.en
modification of the law
dc.subject.en
adequate application clause
dc.subject.en
principle of the tripartite division of powers
dc.subject.en
principle of legal certainty
dc.subject.pl
wymiar sprawiedliwości
dc.subject.pl
tekst bezpośrednio rozumiany
dc.subject.pl
prawotwórstwo sądowe
dc.subject.pl
modyfikacja prawa
dc.subject.pl
klauzula odpowiedniego stosowania prawa
dc.subject.pl
zasada trójpodziału władz
dc.subject.pl
zasada pewności prawa
dc.subtype
Article
dc.title
Modyfikacja tekstu prawnego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego : problem wykładni prawa czy niedozwolona wypowiedź normatywna
dc.title.alternative
Modification of a legal text in the case law of the Supreme Court : a problem of interpretation of the law or an impermissible normative statement
dc.title.journal
Studia z zakresu prawa pracy i polityki społecznej
dc.type
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeen
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
13
Views per month
Views per city
Krakow
6
Szczecin
5
Gdansk
1
Warsaw
1
Downloads
piatkowski_modyfikacja_tekstu_prawnego_w_orzecznictwie_sadu_najwyzszego_2023.pdf
12