Krytyczna analiza postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 marca 2016 r., I CSK 64/15

2017
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enAfter the judgment of 11 March 2016 no. I CSK 64/15 given by the Polish Supreme Court it seems to be impossible to define in Polish legal space the proper law applicable to the succession case. In a very short succession judgment (in which the deceased Polish citizen died in Sweden in 2008) Supreme Court has done at least three fundamental mistakes concerning the intertemporal application of legal rules. The Supreme Court has not recognized that Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 (of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession) is applied only to the succession of persons who die on or after 17 August 2015. It mistook also the rules of 1965 Polish statute on private international law with a new one (2011). Conclusions drawn from this particular case by court are too broad and can be applied also to cases much more different that case on which the judgment was based. Court decision analyzed in this article is an example of the comic solution of the problems arising in the Polish succession law. This is why the criticism on this order seems to be important because of its possible influence on future Polish court's practice.pl
dc.contributor.authorCzubik, Paweł - 127674 pl
dc.date.accession2019-11-20pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T16:09:00Z
dc.date.available2019-11-20T16:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2017pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physical168-175pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume15pl
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/qb9p-0r89pl
dc.identifier.issn1730-4504pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/87492
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.europeistyka.uj.edu.pl/documents/3458728/138959185/P.+Czubik.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-SA
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enjurisdiction to rule on the successionpl
dc.subject.enRegulation 650/2012pl
dc.subject.enchoice of lawpl
dc.subject.pljurysdykcja w sprawie spadkowejpl
dc.subject.plrozporządzenie 650/2012pl
dc.subject.plwybór prawapl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleKrytyczna analiza postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 marca 2016 r., I CSK 64/15pl
dc.title.alternativeCritical appraisal of the decision of the Supreme Court of 11 March 2016 in the case I CSK 64/15pl
dc.title.journalProblemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczegopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
After the judgment of 11 March 2016 no. I CSK 64/15 given by the Polish Supreme Court it seems to be impossible to define in Polish legal space the proper law applicable to the succession case. In a very short succession judgment (in which the deceased Polish citizen died in Sweden in 2008) Supreme Court has done at least three fundamental mistakes concerning the intertemporal application of legal rules. The Supreme Court has not recognized that Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 (of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession) is applied only to the succession of persons who die on or after 17 August 2015. It mistook also the rules of 1965 Polish statute on private international law with a new one (2011). Conclusions drawn from this particular case by court are too broad and can be applied also to cases much more different that case on which the judgment was based. Court decision analyzed in this article is an example of the comic solution of the problems arising in the Polish succession law. This is why the criticism on this order seems to be important because of its possible influence on future Polish court's practice.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Czubik, Paweł - 127674
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-11-20
dc.date.accessioned
2019-11-20T16:09:00Z
dc.date.available
2019-11-20T16:09:00Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2017
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physicalpl
168-175
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
15
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/qb9p-0r89
dc.identifier.issnpl
1730-4504
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/87492
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.europeistyka.uj.edu.pl/documents/3458728/138959185/P.+Czubik.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-SA
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
jurisdiction to rule on the succession
dc.subject.enpl
Regulation 650/2012
dc.subject.enpl
choice of law
dc.subject.plpl
jurysdykcja w sprawie spadkowej
dc.subject.plpl
rozporządzenie 650/2012
dc.subject.plpl
wybór prawa
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Krytyczna analiza postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 marca 2016 r., I CSK 64/15
dc.title.alternativepl
Critical appraisal of the decision of the Supreme Court of 11 March 2016 in the case I CSK 64/15
dc.title.journalpl
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
2
Views per month
Downloads
czubik_krytyczna_analiza_postanowienia_sadu_najwyzszego_2017.odt
1
czubik_krytyczna_analiza_postanowienia_sadu_najwyzszego_2017.pdf
1