Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Wykreślenie klauzul 13.7 oraz 13.8 FIDIC a możliwość zastosowania kodeksowych klauzul rebus sic stantibus
Journal
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
10
Alternative title
Rebus sic stantibus clauses in the light of exclusion of clauses 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC
Author
Wanat Emanuel
Number
2
Pages
53-89
ISSN
1641-1609
Access date
2019-10-11
Remarks
Bibliogr. s. 86-88
Language
Polish
Journal language
Polish
Abstract in English
The aim of the article is to analyze the relationship between the valorization clauses included in FIDIC - clauses 13.7 and 13.8 - and the statutory provisions on rebus sic stantibus. In the light of recent developments in the Polish legal system, a view has been shared among the courts that the exclusion of the 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC by the parties, should lead to automatic exclusion of any right of a party to request valorization based on the statutory grounds as well. It is this article's author's opinion that the view is wrong and the exclusion of the FIDIC valorization clauses should not automatically prevent the parties from invoking rebus sic stantibus rights and having their remuneration valorized to reflect change of the circumstances
| dc.abstract.en | The aim of the article is to analyze the relationship between the valorization clauses included in FIDIC - clauses 13.7 and 13.8 - and the statutory provisions on rebus sic stantibus. In the light of recent developments in the Polish legal system, a view has been shared among the courts that the exclusion of the 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC by the parties, should lead to automatic exclusion of any right of a party to request valorization based on the statutory grounds as well. It is this article's author's opinion that the view is wrong and the exclusion of the FIDIC valorization clauses should not automatically prevent the parties from invoking rebus sic stantibus rights and having their remuneration valorized to reflect change of the circumstances | pl |
| dc.contributor.author | Wanat, Emanuel | pl |
| dc.date.accession | 2019-10-11 | pl |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-11T07:42:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-11T07:42:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | pl |
| dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
| dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
| dc.description.additional | Bibliogr. s. 86-88 | pl |
| dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
| dc.description.physical | 53-89 | pl |
| dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.26106/bdyn-0767 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1641-1609 | pl |
| dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / OP | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84572 | |
| dc.identifier.weblink | http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tpp_2-2017_wanat.pdf | pl |
| dc.language | pol | pl |
| dc.language.container | pol | pl |
| dc.rights | Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych | * |
| dc.rights.licence | Inna otwarta licencja | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf | * |
| dc.share.type | otwarte czasopismo | |
| dc.subtype | Article | pl |
| dc.title | Wykreślenie klauzul 13.7 oraz 13.8 FIDIC a możliwość zastosowania kodeksowych klauzul rebus sic stantibus | pl |
| dc.title.alternative | Rebus sic stantibus clauses in the light of exclusion of clauses 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC | pl |
| dc.title.journal | Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego | pl |
| dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
dc.abstract.enpl
The aim of the article is to analyze the relationship between the valorization clauses included in FIDIC - clauses 13.7 and 13.8 - and the statutory provisions on rebus sic stantibus. In the light of recent developments in the Polish legal system, a view has been shared among the courts that the exclusion of the 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC by the parties, should lead to automatic exclusion of any right of a party to request valorization based on the statutory grounds as well. It is this article's author's opinion that the view is wrong and the exclusion of the FIDIC valorization clauses should not automatically prevent the parties from invoking rebus sic stantibus rights and having their remuneration valorized to reflect change of the circumstances dc.contributor.authorpl
Wanat, Emanuel dc.date.accessionpl
2019-10-11 dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-11T07:42:57Z dc.date.available
2019-10-11T07:42:57Z dc.date.issuedpl
2017 dc.date.openaccess
0 dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 86-88 dc.description.numberpl
2 dc.description.physicalpl
53-89 dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/bdyn-0767 dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609 dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84572 dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tpp_2-2017_wanat.pdf dc.languagepl
pol dc.language.containerpl
pol dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych dc.rights.licence
Inna otwarta licencja dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo dc.subtypepl
Article dc.titlepl
Wykreślenie klauzul 13.7 oraz 13.8 FIDIC a możliwość zastosowania kodeksowych klauzul rebus sic stantibus dc.title.alternativepl
Rebus sic stantibus clauses in the light of exclusion of clauses 13.7 and 13.8 FIDIC dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego dc.typepl
JournalArticle dspace.entity.type
Publication Affiliations
Wydział Prawa i Administracji
Wanat, Emanuel
