Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Nowelizacja instytucji przedawnienia w polskim kodeksie cywilnym z 13 kwietnia 2018 r. : analiza prawna
Changes to the institution of prescription in Polish Civil Code of 13 April 2018 : legal analysis
nowelizacja
przedawnienie
ochrona konsumenta
słabsza strona stosunku cywilnoprawnego
nowelizacja z dnia 13 kwietnia 2018 r.
amendment
prescription
consumer protection
protection of a weaker party to a civil law relationship
amendment of 13 April 2018
Bibliogr. s. 143-146
The text deals with changes to the prescription in Polish Civil Code. It argues that the novelization has a broader application compared to what the legislator assumed. New regulation can be described as 'little revolution' in the institution of prescription. Starting from 9 July 2018, a court has to consider ex officio the expiry of the prescription period for the benefit of a consumer. In order to maximize the functions of the relevant regulation there is a need to interpret the term of a consumer (Article 221 of Polish Civil Code) in an extended way. The regulation of prescription in cases involving consumers should also be applied to (broadly defined) change of a party to a civil law relationship (i.a. from B2B to B2C) due to e.g. assignment of the credit, change of debtor or inheritance and claims arising from the void legal action. The legislator decided to provide absolute control over that aspect to the courts, and according to the prevailing opinion a consumer is no longer entitled to waive the benefits of the prescription. Whether to apply or to not apply the prescription in specific case is in discretion of the courts. Moreover, the new regulation has also impact on the acquisitive prescription and preclusion periods. The new Article 118 second sentence of Polish Civil Code extends the expiry of prescription period and it is applicable mutatis mutandi to acquisitive prescription and preclusion periods.
dc.abstract.en | The text deals with changes to the prescription in Polish Civil Code. It argues that the novelization has a broader application compared to what the legislator assumed. New regulation can be described as 'little revolution' in the institution of prescription. Starting from 9 July 2018, a court has to consider ex officio the expiry of the prescription period for the benefit of a consumer. In order to maximize the functions of the relevant regulation there is a need to interpret the term of a consumer (Article 221 of Polish Civil Code) in an extended way. The regulation of prescription in cases involving consumers should also be applied to (broadly defined) change of a party to a civil law relationship (i.a. from B2B to B2C) due to e.g. assignment of the credit, change of debtor or inheritance and claims arising from the void legal action. The legislator decided to provide absolute control over that aspect to the courts, and according to the prevailing opinion a consumer is no longer entitled to waive the benefits of the prescription. Whether to apply or to not apply the prescription in specific case is in discretion of the courts. Moreover, the new regulation has also impact on the acquisitive prescription and preclusion periods. The new Article 118 second sentence of Polish Civil Code extends the expiry of prescription period and it is applicable mutatis mutandi to acquisitive prescription and preclusion periods. | pl |
dc.affiliation | Wydział Prawa i Administracji | pl |
dc.affiliation | Szkoła Doktorska Nauk Społecznych | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Wielgus, Kamil - 234906 | pl |
dc.date.accession | 2019-10-10 | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-10T10:04:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-10T10:04:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.additional | Bibliogr. s. 143-146 | pl |
dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
dc.description.physical | 109-147 | pl |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.26106/rjp5-6j54 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1641-1609 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / OP | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84457 | |
dc.identifier.weblink | http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/TPP-2-2019-wielgus.pdf | pl |
dc.language | pol | pl |
dc.language.container | pol | pl |
dc.rights | Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych | * |
dc.rights.licence | Inna otwarta licencja | |
dc.rights.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf | * |
dc.share.type | otwarte czasopismo | |
dc.subject.en | amendment | pl |
dc.subject.en | prescription | pl |
dc.subject.en | consumer protection | pl |
dc.subject.en | protection of a weaker party to a civil law relationship | pl |
dc.subject.en | amendment of 13 April 2018 | pl |
dc.subject.pl | nowelizacja | pl |
dc.subject.pl | przedawnienie | pl |
dc.subject.pl | ochrona konsumenta | pl |
dc.subject.pl | słabsza strona stosunku cywilnoprawnego | pl |
dc.subject.pl | nowelizacja z dnia 13 kwietnia 2018 r. | pl |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | Nowelizacja instytucji przedawnienia w polskim kodeksie cywilnym z 13 kwietnia 2018 r. : analiza prawna | pl |
dc.title.alternative | Changes to the institution of prescription in Polish Civil Code of 13 April 2018 : legal analysis | pl |
dc.title.journal | Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
50
Views per month
Views per city
Downloads
Open Access