Attribution of responsibility after the EU accession to the ECHR and the "Co-Respondent Mechanism"

2018
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enWhether the European Union accedes to the European Convention on Human Rights is not a foregone conclusion, or at least not to the extent that it used to be in the period 2010-2014. Even though the accession remains a self-imposed obligation of the EU (Art. 6 (2) TUE), difficulties with gearing the Convention system to the EU’s specificity, especially after the convoluted Opinion 2/13 of the CJEU, might finally turn out too overwhelming for the Union – which currently needs to address much more urgent issues. Yet apart from the symbolic dimension of the accession (which still might rekindle some pro-European enthusiasm), this act, even viewed only from the theoretical point of view, offers a surprisingly innovative perspective of relations between international organisations and control systems of international human rights conventions. Among these relations issues related to international responsibility – and shared responsibility in particular – come to the fore. Attributing responsibility to the EU and/or its Member States after the accession is something of an uncharted territory. There exist general rules of law of international responsibility, there is case law of the ECtHR (and of the EComHR), but the exact norms governing attributing responsibility and co-responsibility in the case of the EU are not yet fully determined. Nevertheless, they might be of considerable importance for future development of law of international responsibility of IOs.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych : Instytut Europeistykipl
dc.contributor.authorTacik, Przemysław - 105754 pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-12T12:06:40Z
dc.date.available2019-03-12T12:06:40Z
dc.date.created2016pl
dc.date.issued2018pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical29-54pl
dc.description.publication1,15pl
dc.description.volume16pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/22115897-01601004pl
dc.identifier.eissn2211-5897pl
dc.identifier.isbn978-90-04-35977-2pl
dc.identifier.issn1569-6456pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / Opl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/70237
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsDodaję tylko opis bibliograficzny*
dc.rights.licenceBez licencji otwartego dostępu
dc.rights.uri*
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleAttribution of responsibility after the EU accession to the ECHR and the "Co-Respondent Mechanism"pl
dc.title.journalBaltic Yearbook of International Lawpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Whether the European Union accedes to the European Convention on Human Rights is not a foregone conclusion, or at least not to the extent that it used to be in the period 2010-2014. Even though the accession remains a self-imposed obligation of the EU (Art. 6 (2) TUE), difficulties with gearing the Convention system to the EU’s specificity, especially after the convoluted Opinion 2/13 of the CJEU, might finally turn out too overwhelming for the Union – which currently needs to address much more urgent issues. Yet apart from the symbolic dimension of the accession (which still might rekindle some pro-European enthusiasm), this act, even viewed only from the theoretical point of view, offers a surprisingly innovative perspective of relations between international organisations and control systems of international human rights conventions. Among these relations issues related to international responsibility – and shared responsibility in particular – come to the fore. Attributing responsibility to the EU and/or its Member States after the accession is something of an uncharted territory. There exist general rules of law of international responsibility, there is case law of the ECtHR (and of the EComHR), but the exact norms governing attributing responsibility and co-responsibility in the case of the EU are not yet fully determined. Nevertheless, they might be of considerable importance for future development of law of international responsibility of IOs.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych : Instytut Europeistyki
dc.contributor.authorpl
Tacik, Przemysław - 105754
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-12T12:06:40Z
dc.date.available
2019-03-12T12:06:40Z
dc.date.createdpl
2016
dc.date.issuedpl
2018
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
29-54
dc.description.publicationpl
1,15
dc.description.volumepl
16
dc.identifier.doipl
10.1163/22115897-01601004
dc.identifier.eissnpl
2211-5897
dc.identifier.isbnpl
978-90-04-35977-2
dc.identifier.issnpl
1569-6456
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / O
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/70237
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Dodaję tylko opis bibliograficzny
dc.rights.licence
Bez licencji otwartego dostępu
dc.rights.uri*
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Attribution of responsibility after the EU accession to the ECHR and the "Co-Respondent Mechanism"
dc.title.journalpl
Baltic Yearbook of International Law
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
5
Views per month
Views per city
Konstanz
1
Krakow
1

No access

No Thumbnail Available