Normy Konstytucji jako źródło ograniczeń dowodowych w postępowaniu cywilnym

2017
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThe right to prove the truth in the court is the implementation of the constitutional right to a fair trial. Polish Code of Civil Procedure does not contain a general regulation concerning the restrictions on admissibility of evidence in the context of the legality of its acquisition. Courts invented the method of assessing the admissibility of evidence, confronting the right to a fair trial with another constitutional value that has been violated by the producing of evidence. While exercising this method, courts use a weighing mechanism similar to the Alexy’s model of balancing of principles. On the ground of the Polish Constitution, within this mechanism, the proportionality test should be used, and the principle of legalism of the actions of the State should be taken into account. This means that the court should not allow for the inclusion of evidence collected with violation of the law by public authority, because the state authorities do not have the constitutional right to a fair trial to justify the violation. Furthermore, this method allows the courts to settle a collision of values based on the axiology contained in the norms of the Polish Constitution.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Prawa Konstytucyjnegopl
dc.contributor.authorKrzemiński, Marcin - 159006 pl
dc.date.accession2019-02-27pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-27T14:03:35Z
dc.date.available2019-02-27T14:03:35Z
dc.date.issued2017pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 80-81pl
dc.description.number4pl
dc.description.physical62-81pl
dc.description.publication1pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.issn2544-2031pl
dc.identifier.projectOPUS K/PBO/000393pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/69394
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://journals.law.uj.edu.pl/przeglad_konstytucyjny/article/view/108/70pl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.licenceInna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/pl/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enadmissibility of evidencepl
dc.subject.enright to fair trialpl
dc.subject.enbalancing of principlespl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleNormy Konstytucji jako źródło ograniczeń dowodowych w postępowaniu cywilnympl
dc.title.alternativeNorms of the constitution as a source of limits of evidence in civil procedurepl
dc.title.journalPrzegląd Konstytucyjnypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
The right to prove the truth in the court is the implementation of the constitutional right to a fair trial. Polish Code of Civil Procedure does not contain a general regulation concerning the restrictions on admissibility of evidence in the context of the legality of its acquisition. Courts invented the method of assessing the admissibility of evidence, confronting the right to a fair trial with another constitutional value that has been violated by the producing of evidence. While exercising this method, courts use a weighing mechanism similar to the Alexy’s model of balancing of principles. On the ground of the Polish Constitution, within this mechanism, the proportionality test should be used, and the principle of legalism of the actions of the State should be taken into account. This means that the court should not allow for the inclusion of evidence collected with violation of the law by public authority, because the state authorities do not have the constitutional right to a fair trial to justify the violation. Furthermore, this method allows the courts to settle a collision of values based on the axiology contained in the norms of the Polish Constitution.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Prawa Konstytucyjnego
dc.contributor.authorpl
Krzemiński, Marcin - 159006
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-02-27
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-27T14:03:35Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-27T14:03:35Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2017
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 80-81
dc.description.numberpl
4
dc.description.physicalpl
62-81
dc.description.publicationpl
1
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.issnpl
2544-2031
dc.identifier.projectpl
OPUS K/PBO/000393
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/69394
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
https://journals.law.uj.edu.pl/przeglad_konstytucyjny/article/view/108/70
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.licence
Inna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/pl/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
admissibility of evidence
dc.subject.enpl
right to fair trial
dc.subject.enpl
balancing of principles
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Normy Konstytucji jako źródło ograniczeń dowodowych w postępowaniu cywilnym
dc.title.alternativepl
Norms of the constitution as a source of limits of evidence in civil procedure
dc.title.journalpl
Przegląd Konstytucyjny
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
1
Views per month
Downloads
krzeminski_normy_konstytucji_jako_zrodlo_ograniczen_dowodowych_w_postepowaniu_cywilnym_2017.pdf
27
krzeminski_normy_konstytucji_jako_zrodlo_ograniczen_dowodowych_w_postepowaniu_cywilnym_2017.odt
3