Assessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinations

2019
journal article
article
30
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-09T20:40:43Z
dc.abstract.enPurpose: To assess and compare radiation dose and image quality from non-contrast head and neck computed tomography (CT) examinations from four different multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners. Material and methods: Four CT scanners with different numbers of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated. Common CT dose descriptors including volumetric CT dose index (CTDIv), dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (ED), and image quality parameters include image noise, uniformity, and spatial resolution (SR) were estimated for each CT scanner with standard tools and methods. To have a precise comparison between CT scanners and related doses and image quality parameters, the ImPACT Q-factor was used. Results: Minimum and maximum CTDIv, DLP, and ED in the head scan were 18 ± 3 and 49 ± 4 mGy, 242 ± 28 and 692 ± 173 mGy × cm, 0.46 ± 0.4 and 1.31 ± 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. And 16 ± 2 to 27 ± 3, 286 ± 127 to 645 ± 79 and 1.46 ± 0.65 to 3.29 ± 0.40 for neck scan, respectively. The Q-factor in head scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. The Q-factor in neck scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. Conclusions: The results clearly indicate an increasing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations. This increasing trend is due to a better SR and less noise of images taken and/or fewer doses in 64-MDCT.pl
dc.contributor.authorKhoramian, Daryoushpl
dc.contributor.authorSistani, Soroushpl
dc.contributor.authorFirouzjah, Razzagh Abedipl
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T11:37:37Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T11:37:37Z
dc.date.issued2019pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. e66-e67pl
dc.description.physicale61-e67pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume84pl
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/pjr.2019.82743pl
dc.identifier.eissn1899-0967pl
dc.identifier.issn1733-134Xpl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/68731
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integratorfalse
dc.subject.encomputed tomographypl
dc.subject.enmulti-detector CT (MDCT)pl
dc.subject.enmedical radiation dosepl
dc.subject.enimage qualitypl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleAssessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinationspl
dc.title.journalPolish Journal of Radiologypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-09T20:40:43Z
dc.abstract.enpl
Purpose: To assess and compare radiation dose and image quality from non-contrast head and neck computed tomography (CT) examinations from four different multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners. Material and methods: Four CT scanners with different numbers of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated. Common CT dose descriptors including volumetric CT dose index (CTDIv), dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (ED), and image quality parameters include image noise, uniformity, and spatial resolution (SR) were estimated for each CT scanner with standard tools and methods. To have a precise comparison between CT scanners and related doses and image quality parameters, the ImPACT Q-factor was used. Results: Minimum and maximum CTDIv, DLP, and ED in the head scan were 18 ± 3 and 49 ± 4 mGy, 242 ± 28 and 692 ± 173 mGy × cm, 0.46 ± 0.4 and 1.31 ± 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. And 16 ± 2 to 27 ± 3, 286 ± 127 to 645 ± 79 and 1.46 ± 0.65 to 3.29 ± 0.40 for neck scan, respectively. The Q-factor in head scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. The Q-factor in neck scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively. Conclusions: The results clearly indicate an increasing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations. This increasing trend is due to a better SR and less noise of images taken and/or fewer doses in 64-MDCT.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Khoramian, Daryoush
dc.contributor.authorpl
Sistani, Soroush
dc.contributor.authorpl
Firouzjah, Razzagh Abedi
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-19T11:37:37Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-19T11:37:37Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2019
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. e66-e67
dc.description.physicalpl
e61-e67
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
84
dc.identifier.doipl
10.5114/pjr.2019.82743
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1899-0967
dc.identifier.issnpl
1733-134X
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/68731
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integrator
false
dc.subject.enpl
computed tomography
dc.subject.enpl
multi-detector CT (MDCT)
dc.subject.enpl
medical radiation dose
dc.subject.enpl
image quality
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Assessment and comparison of radiation dose and image quality in multi-detector CT scanners in non-contrast head and neck examinations
dc.title.journalpl
Polish Journal of Radiology
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
9
Views per month
Views per city
Hong Kong
6
Ashburn
2
Downloads
khoramian_sistani_firouzjah_assessment_and_comparison_of_radiation_dose_2019.pdf
49
khoramian_sistani_firouzjah_assessment_and_comparison_of_radiation_dose_2019.odt
37