Artykuł analizuje orzeczenie TSUE, C-106/17 w sprawie Hofsoe.
abstract in English:
This contribution analyzes the CJUE ruling “Hofsoe” which
holds that Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December
2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of
judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction
with Article 11(1)(b) of that regulation, must be interpreted as
meaning that it may not be relied on by a natural person, whose
professional activity consists, inter alia, in recovering claims
for damages from insurers and who relies on a contract for the
assignment of a claim concluded with the victim of a road accident,
to bring a civil liability action against the insurer of the
person responsible for that accident, which has its registered
office in a Member State other than the Member State of the
place of domicile of the injured party, before a court of the
Member State in which the injured party is domiciled. The author
approves the CJUE judgment.
keywords in Polish:
rozporządzenie Bruksela Ia, sprawy ubezpieczeniowe, poszkodowany, jursydykcja międzynarodowa
keywords in English:
Brussels Ia regulation, insurance matters, international jurisdiction, the concept of a 'victim'
number of pulisher's sheets:
0,5
affiliation:
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Prawa Cywilnego