Psychological argumentation in confucian ethics as a methodological issue in cross-cultural philosophy

2016
journal article
article
8
dc.abstract.enGraham Priest claims that Asian philosophy is going to constitute one of the most important aspects in 21st-century philosophical research (Priest 2003). Assuming that this statement is true, it leads to a methodological question whether the dominant comparative and contrastive approaches will be supplanted by a more unifying methodology that works across different philosophical traditions. In this article, I concentrate on the use of empirical evidence from nonphilosophical disciplines, which enjoys popularity among many Western philosophers, and examine the application of this approach to early Chinese philosophy. I specifically focus on Confucian ethics and the study of altruism in experimental psychology.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Filozoficzny : Katedra Porównawczych Studiów Cywilizacjipl
dc.contributor.authorBanka, Rafał - 184920 pl
dc.date.accession2016-11-22pl
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-22T19:00:29Z
dc.date.available2016-11-22T19:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2016pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalRecenzowane materiały z konferencji: 47th Annual Meeting (SACP), dn. 1-4.10.2015, Monterey w USApl
dc.description.number4pl
dc.description.physical591-606pl
dc.description.publication1,5pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume15pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11712-016-9523-9pl
dc.identifier.eissn1569-7274pl
dc.identifier.issn1540-3009pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / Ppl
dc.identifier.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/32662
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11712-016-9523-9.pdfpl
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeinne
dc.subject.encomparative philosophypl
dc.subject.enconfucian ethicspl
dc.subject.enphilosophical methodologypl
dc.subject.enexperimental evidencepl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titlePsychological argumentation in confucian ethics as a methodological issue in cross-cultural philosophypl
dc.title.journalDaopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Graham Priest claims that Asian philosophy is going to constitute one of the most important aspects in 21st-century philosophical research (Priest 2003). Assuming that this statement is true, it leads to a methodological question whether the dominant comparative and contrastive approaches will be supplanted by a more unifying methodology that works across different philosophical traditions. In this article, I concentrate on the use of empirical evidence from nonphilosophical disciplines, which enjoys popularity among many Western philosophers, and examine the application of this approach to early Chinese philosophy. I specifically focus on Confucian ethics and the study of altruism in experimental psychology.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Filozoficzny : Katedra Porównawczych Studiów Cywilizacji
dc.contributor.authorpl
Banka, Rafał - 184920
dc.date.accessionpl
2016-11-22
dc.date.accessioned
2016-11-22T19:00:29Z
dc.date.available
2016-11-22T19:00:29Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2016
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Recenzowane materiały z konferencji: 47th Annual Meeting (SACP), dn. 1-4.10.2015, Monterey w USA
dc.description.numberpl
4
dc.description.physicalpl
591-606
dc.description.publicationpl
1,5
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
15
dc.identifier.doipl
10.1007/s11712-016-9523-9
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1569-7274
dc.identifier.issnpl
1540-3009
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / P
dc.identifier.uri
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/32662
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11712-016-9523-9.pdf
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
inne
dc.subject.enpl
comparative philosophy
dc.subject.enpl
confucian ethics
dc.subject.enpl
philosophical methodology
dc.subject.enpl
experimental evidence
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Psychological argumentation in confucian ethics as a methodological issue in cross-cultural philosophy
dc.title.journalpl
Dao
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
1
Views per month
Downloads
banka_psychological_argumentation_in_confucian_ethics_2016.pdf
11
banka_psychological_argumentation_in_confucian_ethics_2016.odt
3