Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Psychological argumentation in confucian ethics as a methodological issue in cross-cultural philosophy
comparative philosophy
confucian ethics
philosophical methodology
experimental evidence
Recenzowane materiały z konferencji: 47th Annual Meeting (SACP), dn. 1-4.10.2015, Monterey w USA
Graham Priest claims that Asian philosophy is going to constitute one of the most important aspects in 21st-century philosophical research (Priest 2003). Assuming that this statement is true, it leads to a methodological question whether the dominant comparative and contrastive approaches will be supplanted by a more unifying methodology that works across different philosophical traditions. In this article, I concentrate on the use of empirical evidence from nonphilosophical disciplines, which enjoys popularity among many Western philosophers, and examine the application of this approach to early Chinese philosophy. I specifically focus on Confucian ethics and the study of altruism in experimental psychology.
dc.abstract.en | Graham Priest claims that Asian philosophy is going to constitute one of the most important aspects in 21st-century philosophical research (Priest 2003). Assuming that this statement is true, it leads to a methodological question whether the dominant comparative and contrastive approaches will be supplanted by a more unifying methodology that works across different philosophical traditions. In this article, I concentrate on the use of empirical evidence from nonphilosophical disciplines, which enjoys popularity among many Western philosophers, and examine the application of this approach to early Chinese philosophy. I specifically focus on Confucian ethics and the study of altruism in experimental psychology. | pl |
dc.affiliation | Wydział Filozoficzny : Katedra Porównawczych Studiów Cywilizacji | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Banka, Rafał - 184920 | pl |
dc.date.accession | 2016-11-22 | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-22T19:00:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-22T19:00:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.additional | Recenzowane materiały z konferencji: 47th Annual Meeting (SACP), dn. 1-4.10.2015, Monterey w USA | pl |
dc.description.number | 4 | pl |
dc.description.physical | 591-606 | pl |
dc.description.publication | 1,5 | pl |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 15 | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11712-016-9523-9 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1569-7274 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1540-3009 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / P | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/32662 | |
dc.identifier.weblink | https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11712-016-9523-9.pdf | pl |
dc.language | eng | pl |
dc.language.container | eng | pl |
dc.rights | Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa | * |
dc.rights.licence | CC-BY | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl | * |
dc.share.type | inne | |
dc.subject.en | comparative philosophy | pl |
dc.subject.en | confucian ethics | pl |
dc.subject.en | philosophical methodology | pl |
dc.subject.en | experimental evidence | pl |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | Psychological argumentation in confucian ethics as a methodological issue in cross-cultural philosophy | pl |
dc.title.journal | Dao | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
1
Views per month
Downloads
Open Access