Om ikonoklasmen hos Birgitta Trotzig

doi:10.4467/20843933ST.15.025.4584

Om ikonoklasmen hos Birgitta Trotzig

Communities & Collections

pcg.skipToMenu

Om ikonoklasmen hos Birgitta Trotzig

View Usage Statistics

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author	Bak, Krzysztof [SAP11010735]	pl
dc.date.accessioned	2016-07-05T07:44:00Z
dc.date.available	2016-07-05T07:44:00Z
dc.date.created	2015	pl
dc.date.issued	2016	pl
dc.identifier.issn	1897-3035	pl
dc.identifier.uri	http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/28661
dc.language	swe	pl
dc.rights	Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych	*
dc.rights.uri	http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf	*
dc.title	Om ikonoklasmen hos Birgitta Trotzig	pl
dc.title.alternative	On Birgitta Trotzig's notion of iconoclasm	pl
dc.type	JournalArticle	pl
dc.description.physical	275-297	pl
dc.description.additional	Bibliogr. s. 294-297	pl
dc.identifier.weblink	http://www.ejournals.eu/Studia-Litteraria/2015/Issue-4/art/7182/	pl
dc.abstract.en	The Swedish writer Birgitta Trotzig (1928–2011) defines her own process of literary creation in interart terms as a translation of pictures into verbal signs. She often comments on the intersemiotic difficulties involved in this transformation by referring to the Byzantine iconoclastic controversy. Using Trotzig’s notion of the iconoclastic controversy as a starting point, the present article investigates her understanding of the picture-word-transformation problems. The line of argument comprises five stages. In the first stage, the main issue of the article is presented and specified. In the second stage, it is argued that previous critical approaches to Trotzig’s Byzantinism in most cases have been based on misleadingly anachronistic and mainly Occidental categories. In the third stage, the Byzantine iconoclastic controversy is related to the distinctive character of the theological thought of the Eastern Church. In the fourth stage, the Byzantine iconophile and iconoclast theories are applied to Trotzig’s literary works. A close reading of a representative prose poem of hers, “Teologiska variationer” (“Theological variations”), demonstrates that her works unequivocally support the icon theology of the iconodules. In the closing fifth stage, Trotzig’s notion of the Byzantine iconoclastic controversy is reconstructed on the basis of her essays and interviews in which she explains her own as well as other authors’ intersemiotic difficulties. In conclusion, these difficulties are related to general aesthetic, political, ideological and philophical conflicts, all of which are – paradoxically – diagnosed by Trotzig herself in typical categories of Western theology.	pl
dc.subject.en	Birgitta Trotzig	pl
dc.subject.en	iconoclastic controversy	pl
dc.subject.en	Byzantine theology of icon	pl
dc.subject.en	intersemiotic transformation	pl
dc.subject.en	intermediality	pl
dc.description.volume	10	pl
dc.description.number	4	pl
dc.description.points	14	pl
dc.description.publication	1,9	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.4467/20843933ST.15.025.4584	pl
dc.identifier.eissn	2084-3933	pl
dc.title.journal	Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis	pl
dc.language.container	pol	pl
dc.date.accession	2016-07-05	pl
dc.affiliation	Wydział Filologiczny : Instytut Filologii Germańskiej	pl
dc.subtype	Article	pl
dc.rights.original	OTHER; inne; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; po opublikowaniu; 24;	pl
dc.identifier.project	ROD UJ / P	pl
.pointsMNiSW	[2016 B]: 14