Ocena nowych technologii medycznych : "kto strzeże samych strażników?"

2015
working paper
expertise
dc.abstract.plNiniejsza ekspertyza dotyczy problemu kontroli nad właściwym przebiegiem procesu oceny nowych technologii medycznych pod kątem ich skuteczności, bezpieczeństwa i kosztowej efektywności. Jako że w podejmowaniu decyzji o akceptacji, wprowadzeniu na rynek i refundacji nowych technologii medycznych uczestniczy wiele zespołów ludzi, prezentujących czasem zgoła odmienne stanowiska i reprezentujących różne opinie, może dochodzić do konfliktów interesów. Niniejszy artykuł stanowi przegląd grup i instytucji, mających pilnować rzetelnego przebiegu procesu ewaluacji nowych technologii medycznych. Do grup doglądających procesu oceny technologii w medycynie należą pacjenci, środki masowego przekazu, środowiska bioetyczne, ruch EBM (Evidence Based Medicine), agencje HTA (Health Technology Assessment), oraz sami lekarze - dla których ta dodatkowa rola strażników procesu ewaluacji może być szczególnie problematyczna.pl
dc.contributor.authorSzymański, Piotrpl
dc.contributor.authorPasierski, Tomaszpl
dc.contributor.institutionInterdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJpl
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T12:07:44Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T12:07:44Z
dc.date.issued2015pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physical1-9pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/ey8q-mr79pl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/259591
dc.languagepolpl
dc.referencesAvorn J. (2012), Two centuries of assessing drug risks, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 367(3), 193-7.pl
dc.referencesAnker S. D., Agewall S., Borggrefe M., Calvert M., Jaime Caro J., Cowie M. R., Ford I., Paty J. A., Riley J. P., Swedberg K., Tavazzi L., Wiklund I., Kirchhof P. (2014), The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials, “European Heart Journal” 35(30), 2001-9.pl
dc.referencesBalshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H. J., Oxman A. D., Kunz R., Brozek J., Vist G. E., Falck-Ytter Y., Meerpohl J, Norris S., Guyatt G. H. (2011), GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence, “Journal of Clinical Epidemiology” 64(4), 401-6.pl
dc.referencesDawes M., Summerskill W., Glasziou P., Cartabellotta A., Martin J., Hopayian K., Porzsolt F., Burls A., Osborne J., Second International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers (2005), Sicily statement on evidence-based practice, “BMC Medical Education” 5(1), 1.pl
dc.referencesDeJean D., Giacomini M., Schwartz L., Miller F. A. (2009), Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: a descriptive review, “International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care” 25(4), 463-9.pl
dc.referencesDowning N. S., Aminawung J. A., Shah N. D., Krumholz H. M., Ross J. S. (2014), Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 311(4), 368-77.pl
dc.referencesEmanuel E. J., Steinmetz A. (2013), Will physicians lead on controlling health care costs?, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 310(4), 374-5.pl
dc.referencesEmanuel E. J. (2014), Why I hope to die at 75? “The Atlantic”.pl
dc.referencesEvidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992), Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 268(17), 2420-5.pl
dc.referencesFeuerstein J. D., Akbari M., Gifford A. E., Hurley C. M., Leffler D. A., Sheth S. G., Cheifetz A. S. (2014), Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in interventional medicine subspecialty guidelines, “Mayo Clinic Proceedings” 89(1), 16-24.pl
dc.referencesFriedman R. A. (2014), Antidepressants' black-box warning – 10 years later, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 371(18), 1666-8.pl
dc.referencesGebreyes W. A., Dupouy-Camet J., Newport M. J., Oliveira C. J., Schlesinger L. S., Saif Y. M., Kariuki S., Saif L. J., Saville W., Wittum T., Hoet A., Quessy S., Kazwala R., Tekola B., Shryock T., Bisesi M., Patchanee P., Boonmar S., King L. J. (2014), The Global One Health Paradigm: Challenges and Opportunities for Tackling Infectious Diseases at the Human, Animal, and Environment Interface in Low-Resource Settings, “PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases” 8(11), e3257.pl
dc.referencesGeraghty K. E., Wynia M. (2000), Advocacy and community: the social roles of physicians in the last 1000 years. Part III, “Medscape General Medicine” E27.pl
dc.referencesGodman B., et al. (2014), Dabigatran – a continuing exemplar case history demonstrating the need for comprehensive models to optimize the utilization of new drugs, “Frontiers in Pharmacology” 5, 109.pl
dc.referencesHughes D. A., Tunnage B., Yeo S. T. (2005), Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?, “QJM” 98(11), 829-36.pl
dc.referencesHurwicz L. (2007), But Who Will Guard the Guardians?.pl
dc.referencesIoannidis J. P. (2014), More than a billion people taking statins?: Potential implications of the new cardiovascular guidelines, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 311(5), 463-4.pl
dc.referencesLeff B., Finucane T. E. (2008), Gizmo idolatry, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 299(15), 1830-2.pl
dc.referencesLeonardo Alves T., Martins de Freitas A. F., van Eijk M. E., Mantel-Teeuwisse A. K. (2014), Compliance of disease awareness campaigns in printed Dutch media with national and international regulatory guidelines, “PLoS One” 9(9), e106599.pl
dc.referencesLevinsky N. G. (1984), The doctor's master, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 311(24), 1573-5.pl
dc.referencesMoynihan R., Heath I., Henry D. (2002), Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering, “BMJ” 324(7342), 886-91.pl
dc.referencesNeumann P. J., Cohen J. T., Weinstein M. C. (2014), Updating cost-effectiveness – the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 371(9), 796-7.pl
dc.referencesPellegrino E. D. (1993), The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 269(9), 1158-62.pl
dc.referencesPersad G., Wertheimer A., Emanuel E. J. (2009), Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions, “Lancet” 373(9661), 423-31.pl
dc.referencesPeterson E. D., Roe M. T., Mulgund J., DeLong E. R., Lytle B. L., Brindis R. G., Smith S. C. Jr, Pollack C. V. Jr, Newby L. K., Harrington R. A., Gibler W. B., Ohman E. M. (2006), Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 295, 1912-20.pl
dc.referencesRose, S. L. (2013), Patient advocacy organizations: institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness, “The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics” 41(3), 680-687.pl
dc.referencesSzymański P. (2012), Autorytet medycyny opartej na dowodach naukowych a niepewność poznania naukowego, “Medycyna Po Dyplomie” 12, 49-53.pl
dc.referencesTallis R. C. (2006), Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world, “Clinical Medicine” 6(1), 7-12.pl
dc.referencesTruog R. D. (2012), Patients and doctors – evolution of a relationship, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 366(7), 581-5.pl
dc.referencesTilburt J. C., Wynia M. K., Sheeler R. D., Thorsteinsdottir B., James K. M., Egginton J. S., Liebow M., Hurst S., Danis M., Goold S. D. (2013), Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 310(4), 380-8.pl
dc.referencesTikkinen K. A., Leinonen J. S., Guyatt G. H., Ebrahim S., Järvinen T. L. (2012), What is a disease? Perspectives of the public, health professionals and legislators, “BMJ Open” 2(6), e001632.pl
dc.referencesUbel P. A., Angott A. M., Zikmund-Fisher B. J. (2011), Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves, “Arch Intern Med” 171(7), 630-4.pl
dc.referencesVillas Boas P. J., Spagnuolo R. S., Kamegasawa A., Braz L. G., Polachini do Valle A., Jorge E. C., Yoo H. H., Cataneo A. J., Corrêa I., Fukushima F. B., do Nascimento P. Jr, Módolo N. S., Teixeira M. S., de Oliveira Vidal E. I., Daher S. R., El Dib R. (2013), Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age, “Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice” 19(4), 633-7.pl
dc.referencesVogelzang N. J, Breitbart W., Cella D., Curt G. A., Groopman J. E., Horning S. J., Itri L. M., Johnson D. H., Scherr S. L., Portenoy R. K. (1997), Patient, caregiver, and oncologist perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The Fatigue Coalition, “Seminars in Hematology” 34(3 sup. 2), 4-12.pl
dc.referencesWax C. M. (2013), Plato versus Hippocrates, “Journal of Medical Economics” 90(4), 3.pl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte repozytorium
dc.subject.plprocedury wdrażania technologii medycznychpl
dc.subject.plrefundacja lekówpl
dc.subject.plmedycyna oparta na faktachpl
dc.subtypeExpertisepl
dc.titleOcena nowych technologii medycznych : "kto strzeże samych strażników?"pl
dc.title.alternativeNew health technology assessment : 'but who will guard the guardians?'pl
dc.typeWorkingPaperpl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.plpl
Niniejsza ekspertyza dotyczy problemu kontroli nad właściwym przebiegiem procesu oceny nowych technologii medycznych pod kątem ich skuteczności, bezpieczeństwa i kosztowej efektywności. Jako że w podejmowaniu decyzji o akceptacji, wprowadzeniu na rynek i refundacji nowych technologii medycznych uczestniczy wiele zespołów ludzi, prezentujących czasem zgoła odmienne stanowiska i reprezentujących różne opinie, może dochodzić do konfliktów interesów. Niniejszy artykuł stanowi przegląd grup i instytucji, mających pilnować rzetelnego przebiegu procesu ewaluacji nowych technologii medycznych. Do grup doglądających procesu oceny technologii w medycynie należą pacjenci, środki masowego przekazu, środowiska bioetyczne, ruch EBM (Evidence Based Medicine), agencje HTA (Health Technology Assessment), oraz sami lekarze - dla których ta dodatkowa rola strażników procesu ewaluacji może być szczególnie problematyczna.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Szymański, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorpl
Pasierski, Tomasz
dc.contributor.institutionpl
Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJ
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-04T12:07:44Z
dc.date.available
2021-01-04T12:07:44Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2015
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physicalpl
1-9
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/ey8q-mr79
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/259591
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.referencespl
Avorn J. (2012), Two centuries of assessing drug risks, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 367(3), 193-7.
dc.referencespl
Anker S. D., Agewall S., Borggrefe M., Calvert M., Jaime Caro J., Cowie M. R., Ford I., Paty J. A., Riley J. P., Swedberg K., Tavazzi L., Wiklund I., Kirchhof P. (2014), The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials, “European Heart Journal” 35(30), 2001-9.
dc.referencespl
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann H. J., Oxman A. D., Kunz R., Brozek J., Vist G. E., Falck-Ytter Y., Meerpohl J, Norris S., Guyatt G. H. (2011), GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence, “Journal of Clinical Epidemiology” 64(4), 401-6.
dc.referencespl
Dawes M., Summerskill W., Glasziou P., Cartabellotta A., Martin J., Hopayian K., Porzsolt F., Burls A., Osborne J., Second International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers (2005), Sicily statement on evidence-based practice, “BMC Medical Education” 5(1), 1.
dc.referencespl
DeJean D., Giacomini M., Schwartz L., Miller F. A. (2009), Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: a descriptive review, “International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care” 25(4), 463-9.
dc.referencespl
Downing N. S., Aminawung J. A., Shah N. D., Krumholz H. M., Ross J. S. (2014), Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 311(4), 368-77.
dc.referencespl
Emanuel E. J., Steinmetz A. (2013), Will physicians lead on controlling health care costs?, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 310(4), 374-5.
dc.referencespl
Emanuel E. J. (2014), Why I hope to die at 75? “The Atlantic”.
dc.referencespl
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992), Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 268(17), 2420-5.
dc.referencespl
Feuerstein J. D., Akbari M., Gifford A. E., Hurley C. M., Leffler D. A., Sheth S. G., Cheifetz A. S. (2014), Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in interventional medicine subspecialty guidelines, “Mayo Clinic Proceedings” 89(1), 16-24.
dc.referencespl
Friedman R. A. (2014), Antidepressants' black-box warning – 10 years later, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 371(18), 1666-8.
dc.referencespl
Gebreyes W. A., Dupouy-Camet J., Newport M. J., Oliveira C. J., Schlesinger L. S., Saif Y. M., Kariuki S., Saif L. J., Saville W., Wittum T., Hoet A., Quessy S., Kazwala R., Tekola B., Shryock T., Bisesi M., Patchanee P., Boonmar S., King L. J. (2014), The Global One Health Paradigm: Challenges and Opportunities for Tackling Infectious Diseases at the Human, Animal, and Environment Interface in Low-Resource Settings, “PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases” 8(11), e3257.
dc.referencespl
Geraghty K. E., Wynia M. (2000), Advocacy and community: the social roles of physicians in the last 1000 years. Part III, “Medscape General Medicine” E27.
dc.referencespl
Godman B., et al. (2014), Dabigatran – a continuing exemplar case history demonstrating the need for comprehensive models to optimize the utilization of new drugs, “Frontiers in Pharmacology” 5, 109.
dc.referencespl
Hughes D. A., Tunnage B., Yeo S. T. (2005), Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?, “QJM” 98(11), 829-36.
dc.referencespl
Hurwicz L. (2007), But Who Will Guard the Guardians?.
dc.referencespl
Ioannidis J. P. (2014), More than a billion people taking statins?: Potential implications of the new cardiovascular guidelines, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 311(5), 463-4.
dc.referencespl
Leff B., Finucane T. E. (2008), Gizmo idolatry, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 299(15), 1830-2.
dc.referencespl
Leonardo Alves T., Martins de Freitas A. F., van Eijk M. E., Mantel-Teeuwisse A. K. (2014), Compliance of disease awareness campaigns in printed Dutch media with national and international regulatory guidelines, “PLoS One” 9(9), e106599.
dc.referencespl
Levinsky N. G. (1984), The doctor's master, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 311(24), 1573-5.
dc.referencespl
Moynihan R., Heath I., Henry D. (2002), Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering, “BMJ” 324(7342), 886-91.
dc.referencespl
Neumann P. J., Cohen J. T., Weinstein M. C. (2014), Updating cost-effectiveness – the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 371(9), 796-7.
dc.referencespl
Pellegrino E. D. (1993), The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 269(9), 1158-62.
dc.referencespl
Persad G., Wertheimer A., Emanuel E. J. (2009), Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions, “Lancet” 373(9661), 423-31.
dc.referencespl
Peterson E. D., Roe M. T., Mulgund J., DeLong E. R., Lytle B. L., Brindis R. G., Smith S. C. Jr, Pollack C. V. Jr, Newby L. K., Harrington R. A., Gibler W. B., Ohman E. M. (2006), Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 295, 1912-20.
dc.referencespl
Rose, S. L. (2013), Patient advocacy organizations: institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness, “The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics” 41(3), 680-687.
dc.referencespl
Szymański P. (2012), Autorytet medycyny opartej na dowodach naukowych a niepewność poznania naukowego, “Medycyna Po Dyplomie” 12, 49-53.
dc.referencespl
Tallis R. C. (2006), Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world, “Clinical Medicine” 6(1), 7-12.
dc.referencespl
Truog R. D. (2012), Patients and doctors – evolution of a relationship, “The New England Journal of Medicine” 366(7), 581-5.
dc.referencespl
Tilburt J. C., Wynia M. K., Sheeler R. D., Thorsteinsdottir B., James K. M., Egginton J. S., Liebow M., Hurst S., Danis M., Goold S. D. (2013), Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs, “Journal of the American Medical Association” 310(4), 380-8.
dc.referencespl
Tikkinen K. A., Leinonen J. S., Guyatt G. H., Ebrahim S., Järvinen T. L. (2012), What is a disease? Perspectives of the public, health professionals and legislators, “BMJ Open” 2(6), e001632.
dc.referencespl
Ubel P. A., Angott A. M., Zikmund-Fisher B. J. (2011), Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves, “Arch Intern Med” 171(7), 630-4.
dc.referencespl
Villas Boas P. J., Spagnuolo R. S., Kamegasawa A., Braz L. G., Polachini do Valle A., Jorge E. C., Yoo H. H., Cataneo A. J., Corrêa I., Fukushima F. B., do Nascimento P. Jr, Módolo N. S., Teixeira M. S., de Oliveira Vidal E. I., Daher S. R., El Dib R. (2013), Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age, “Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice” 19(4), 633-7.
dc.referencespl
Vogelzang N. J, Breitbart W., Cella D., Curt G. A., Groopman J. E., Horning S. J., Itri L. M., Johnson D. H., Scherr S. L., Portenoy R. K. (1997), Patient, caregiver, and oncologist perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The Fatigue Coalition, “Seminars in Hematology” 34(3 sup. 2), 4-12.
dc.referencespl
Wax C. M. (2013), Plato versus Hippocrates, “Journal of Medical Economics” 90(4), 3.
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte repozytorium
dc.subject.plpl
procedury wdrażania technologii medycznych
dc.subject.plpl
refundacja leków
dc.subject.plpl
medycyna oparta na faktach
dc.subtypepl
Expertise
dc.titlepl
Ocena nowych technologii medycznych : "kto strzeże samych strażników?"
dc.title.alternativepl
New health technology assessment : 'but who will guard the guardians?'
dc.typepl
WorkingPaper
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
72
Views per month
Views per city
Dublin
10
Krakow
6
Ashburn
4
New York
4
Bialystok
2
Chandler
2
Koszalin
2
Lomé
2
San Jose
2
Sofia
2
Downloads
szymanski_pasierski_ocena_nowych_technologii_2015.pdf
9