Brzytwa Ockhama czy brzytwa Austina : która ostrzejsza?

Brzytwa Ockhama czy brzytwa Austina : która ostrzejsza?

Communities & Collections

Brzytwa Ockhama czy brzytwa Austina : która ostrzejsza?

Bibliographic description

title:	Brzytwa Ockhama czy brzytwa Austina : która ostrzejsza?
alternative title:	Ockham's razor or Austin's razor : which one is sharper?
author:	Kamińska Sonia
journal title:	Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Nauki Humanistyczne
issue:	2 (1)
date of publication :	2011
pages:	35-50
ISSN:	2299-1638
eISSN:	2082-9469
URL:	ftp://ftp.zpu.uj.edu.pl/towarzystwodoktorantow/zeszyty_naukowe/humanistyczne/3_ZN_Humanistyczne_nr_2_2011.pdf#page=35
date accessed:	2016-04-13
notes:	Bibliogr. s. 50
language:	Polish
journal language:	Polish
abstract in English:	The text is an attempt to confront a philosophical "superstition" according to which William of Ockham was a nominalist. I use John L. Austin's text The meaning of a word (1940) in order to explain what I mean when I say that universals are "language-rooted" (that is the most common definition of nominalism). The critique of similarities between things, the rejection of redundant hypostases, the adjuster-words – these are the concepts on the basis of which I introduce a new term, namely "Austin's razor". It is exactly this term which allows me to demonstrate that Ockham's theory is not "language-rooted", as William Ockham turns out to be a conceptualist, which I prove in my commentary on the excerpts from his Summa logicae. In the process I also show that Ockham's theory and the thought of late Austin (from How to talk: some simple ways, 1953) have a lot in common.
affiliation:	Wydział Filozoficzny
type:	journal article
subtype:	academic paper