Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Feasibility randomised trial comparing two forms of mental health supported accommodation (supported housing and floating outreach); a component of the QuEST (Quality and Effectiveness of Supported Tenancies) Study
QuEST
mental health
supported accommodation
feasibility
tria
supported housing
floating outreach
Background: Mental health supported accommodation services are implemented across England, usually organised into a ‘step-down’ care pathway that requires the individual to repeatedly move as they gain skills and confidence for more independent living. There have been no trials comparing the effectiveness of different types of supported accommodation, but two widely used models (supported housing and floating outreach) have been found to provide similar support. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial comparing these two models. Methods: Individually randomised, parallel group feasibility trial in three regions of England (North London, East London, and Cheltenham and Gloucestershire). We aimed to recruit 60 participants in 15 months, referred to supported accommodation, randomly allocated on an equal basis to receive either a local supported housing or floating outreach service. We assessed referrals to the trial, participants recruited, attrition, time from recruitment to moving into either type of supported accommodation, and feasibility of masking. We conducted a process evaluation to examine our results further. Results: We screened 1,432 potential participants, of whom 17 consented to participate, with 8 agreeing to randomisation (of whom 1 was lost to attrition) and 9 participating in naturalistic follow-up. Our process evaluation indicated that the main obstacle to recruitment was staff and service user preferences for certain types of supported accommodation or for specific services. Staff also felt that randomisation compromised their professional judgement.
cris.lastimport.scopus | 2024-04-24T05:21:33Z | |
dc.abstract.en | Background: Mental health supported accommodation services are implemented across England, usually organised into a ‘step-down’ care pathway that requires the individual to repeatedly move as they gain skills and confidence for more independent living. There have been no trials comparing the effectiveness of different types of supported accommodation, but two widely used models (supported housing and floating outreach) have been found to provide similar support. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial comparing these two models. Methods: Individually randomised, parallel group feasibility trial in three regions of England (North London, East London, and Cheltenham and Gloucestershire). We aimed to recruit 60 participants in 15 months, referred to supported accommodation, randomly allocated on an equal basis to receive either a local supported housing or floating outreach service. We assessed referrals to the trial, participants recruited, attrition, time from recruitment to moving into either type of supported accommodation, and feasibility of masking. We conducted a process evaluation to examine our results further. Results: We screened 1,432 potential participants, of whom 17 consented to participate, with 8 agreeing to randomisation (of whom 1 was lost to attrition) and 9 participating in naturalistic follow-up. Our process evaluation indicated that the main obstacle to recruitment was staff and service user preferences for certain types of supported accommodation or for specific services. Staff also felt that randomisation compromised their professional judgement. | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Killaspy, Helen | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Priebe, Stefan | pl |
dc.contributor.author | McPherson, Peter | pl |
dc.contributor.author | McCrone, Paul | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Dowling, Sarah | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Harrison, Isobel | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Krotofil, Joanna - 160303 | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Dalton-Locke, Christian | pl |
dc.contributor.author | McGranahan, Rose | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Arbuthnott, Maurice | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Curtis, Sarah | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Leavey, Gerard | pl |
dc.contributor.author | MacPherson, Rob | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Curtis, Sarah | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Eldridge, Sandra | pl |
dc.contributor.author | King, Michael | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-18T16:17:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-18T16:17:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 10 | pl |
dc.identifier.articleid | 258 | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00258 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1664-0640 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / OP | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/152040 | |
dc.language | eng | pl |
dc.language.container | eng | pl |
dc.rights | Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa | * |
dc.rights.licence | CC-BY | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl | * |
dc.share.type | otwarte czasopismo | |
dc.subject.en | QuEST | pl |
dc.subject.en | mental health | pl |
dc.subject.en | supported accommodation | pl |
dc.subject.en | feasibility | pl |
dc.subject.en | tria | pl |
dc.subject.en | supported housing | pl |
dc.subject.en | floating outreach | pl |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | Feasibility randomised trial comparing two forms of mental health supported accommodation (supported housing and floating outreach); a component of the QuEST (Quality and Effectiveness of Supported Tenancies) Study | pl |
dc.title.journal | Frontiers in Psychiatry | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
0
Views per month
Downloads
Open Access