Jagiellonian University Repository
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization : the step towards hybrid procedures
Communities & Collections
pcg.skipToMenu
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowa
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization : the step towards hybrid procedures
Bibliographic description
| title: | Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization : the step towards hybrid procedures |
| author: | Piątek Jacek, Kędziora Anna  , Konstanty-Kalandyk Janusz , Kiełbasa Grzegorz, Olszewska Marta , Wróbel Krzysztof, HyoChan Song Bryan, Darocha Tomasz, Wróżek Marcin, Kapelak Bogusław
|
| journal title: | Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej |
| volume: | 13 |
| issue: | 4 (50) |
| date of publication : | 2017 |
| pages: | 320-325 |
| ISSN: |
1734-9338 |
| eISSN: |
1897-4295 |
| DOI: | |
| language: | English |
| abstract in English: | Introduction: Coronary artery disease is nowadays responsible for approximately 15% of hospitalizations in Poland. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) represents an attractive alternative to a sternotomy, and at the same time provides better life quality and facilitates quick rehabilitation. Aim: To evaluate whether MIDCAB can be performed with similar early and mid-term results as off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and therefore can be considered as a safe stage in hybrid revascularization. Material and methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 73 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery) between 2013 and 2016 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow. Thirty-eight (52.1%) MIDCAB and 35 (47.9%) OPCAB patients were enrolled. Results: Short-term results did not significantly differ between groups and similar 30-day mortality was observed (MIDCAB 2.6% vs. OPCAB 2.9%, p = 1). The median follow-up period was 21 months. There were no statistical differences in terms of overall survival or cardiac mortality between groups (94.7% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.42; 2.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 1, respectively). The rate of hospitalization due to cardiac causes was similar in both groups (7.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 1) and there were no differences in current exacerbation of angina or heart failure, with median NYHA class I and CCS class I in both groups. Conclusions: Despite higher technical difficulty, MIDCAB procedures can be performed with similar safety results as OPCAB procedures. No differences in terms of mortality, repeat revascularization or recurrent angina are observed. |
| keywords in English: | myocardial revascularization, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, minimally invasive coronary artery bypass, long-term survival, hybrid revascularization |
| departmental parameterization: | 15 |
| affiliation: | Wydział Lekarski : Instytut Kardiologii |
| type: | journal article |
| subtype: | academic paper |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowa
Projekt „Repozytorium otwartego dostępu do dorobku naukowego i dydaktycznego UJ” współfinansowany w ramach poddziałania 2.3.1 „Cyfrowe udostępnianie zasobów nauki” Programu Operacyjnego Polska Cyfrowa z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego i budżetu państwa na podstawie umowy o dofinansowanie nr POPC.02.03.01-00-0030/17-00
