How high is the inter-observer reproducibility in the LIRADS reporting system?

2019
journal article
article
8
dc.abstract.enPurpose: To investigate the reproducibility of LIRADS v2014 and contribute to its widespread use in clinical practice. Material and methods: This retrospective, single-centre study was conducted between January 2010 and October 2015. A total of 132 patients who had dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT) images in the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) with liver nodule were included in the study, 37 of whom had histopathology results. Five radiologists who participated in the study, interpreted liver nodules independently on different PACS stations according to the LIRADS reporting system and its main parameters. Results: We determined that level of inter-observer agreement in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories was higher than in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories (κ = 0.522, 0.442, and 0.600 in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories, respectively; κ = 0.082, 0.298, and 0.143 in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories, respectively). The parameter that we observed to have the highest level of inter-observer agreement was venous thrombus (κ = 0.600). Conclusions: Our study showed that LIRADS achieves an acceptable inter-observer reproducibility in terms of clinical practice although it is insufficient at intermediate risk levels. We think that the prevalence of its use will be further increased with training related to the subject and the assignment of numerical values that express the probability of malignancy for each category and including the ancillary features in the algorithm according to clearer rules.pl
dc.contributor.authorSevim, Sezginpl
dc.contributor.authorDicle, Oğuzpl
dc.contributor.authorGezer, Naciye S.pl
dc.contributor.authorBarış, Mustafa M.pl
dc.contributor.authorAltay, Cananpl
dc.contributor.authorAkın, Işıl Başarapl
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-08T18:46:20Z
dc.date.available2020-01-08T18:46:20Z
dc.date.issued2019pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. e468-e469pl
dc.description.physicale464-e469pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume84pl
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/pjr.2019.90090pl
dc.identifier.eissn1899-0967pl
dc.identifier.issn1733-134Xpl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/130199
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enHCCpl
dc.subject.encirrhosispl
dc.subject.enLIRADSpl
dc.subject.enliver nodulepl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleHow high is the inter-observer reproducibility in the LIRADS reporting system?pl
dc.title.journalPolish Journal of Radiologypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Purpose: To investigate the reproducibility of LIRADS v2014 and contribute to its widespread use in clinical practice. Material and methods: This retrospective, single-centre study was conducted between January 2010 and October 2015. A total of 132 patients who had dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT) images in the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) with liver nodule were included in the study, 37 of whom had histopathology results. Five radiologists who participated in the study, interpreted liver nodules independently on different PACS stations according to the LIRADS reporting system and its main parameters. Results: We determined that level of inter-observer agreement in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories was higher than in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories (κ = 0.522, 0.442, and 0.600 in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories, respectively; κ = 0.082, 0.298, and 0.143 in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories, respectively). The parameter that we observed to have the highest level of inter-observer agreement was venous thrombus (κ = 0.600). Conclusions: Our study showed that LIRADS achieves an acceptable inter-observer reproducibility in terms of clinical practice although it is insufficient at intermediate risk levels. We think that the prevalence of its use will be further increased with training related to the subject and the assignment of numerical values that express the probability of malignancy for each category and including the ancillary features in the algorithm according to clearer rules.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Sevim, Sezgin
dc.contributor.authorpl
Dicle, Oğuz
dc.contributor.authorpl
Gezer, Naciye S.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Barış, Mustafa M.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Altay, Canan
dc.contributor.authorpl
Akın, Işıl Başara
dc.date.accessioned
2020-01-08T18:46:20Z
dc.date.available
2020-01-08T18:46:20Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2019
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. e468-e469
dc.description.physicalpl
e464-e469
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
84
dc.identifier.doipl
10.5114/pjr.2019.90090
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1899-0967
dc.identifier.issnpl
1733-134X
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/130199
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
HCC
dc.subject.enpl
cirrhosis
dc.subject.enpl
LIRADS
dc.subject.enpl
liver nodule
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
How high is the inter-observer reproducibility in the LIRADS reporting system?
dc.title.journalpl
Polish Journal of Radiology
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
22
Views per month
Views per city
Des Moines
5
Dublin
4
Hong Kong
4
Ashburn
3
Wroclaw
2
Chandler
1
Downloads
sevim_dicle_gezer_baris_altay_akin_how_high_is_the_inter-observer_reproducibility_2019.pdf
15
sevim_dicle_gezer_baris_altay_akin_how_high_is_the_inter-observer_reproducibility_2019.odt
8