Iterative reconstruction as a method for optimisation of computed tomography procedures

2017
journal article
article
8
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-09T23:39:48Z
dc.abstract.enBackground: Computed tomography (CT) is still commonly regarded as a method that causes a high radiation exposure. For that reason, producers intensively try to find new solutions for dose reduction while maintaining a high diagnostic value of images. One of the recent strategies focuses on CT image reconstruction. Iterative reconstruction (IR) is an alternative for filtered back projection (FBP) that is commonly used today. The aim of the article is to demonstrate and compare the effects of two IR algorithms on dose value and image details. Material/Methods: Investigations were performed on two 128 multi-detector (MDCT) CT scanners: - iCT (Philips Healthcare with iDose4); - Definitions AS+ (Siemens Medical Solutions with SAFIRE system). The measurements involved: - image quality indicators for the CATPHAN 600 phantom; - dosimetric indicators of exposure (DLP i CTDIvol). Results: The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in the images reconstructed with IR and FBP were analysed, and the SNR(IR)/SNR(FBP) ratios were calculated and correlated with CTDIvol values. The effects of IR and FBP algorithms on low-contrast resolution were also compared in relation to CTDIvol values. The smallest diameter of supra-slice objects in the Catphan phantom were taken into consideration. Conclusions: Both iterative algorithms definitely improved the visibility of low-contrast objects in comparison to a standard algorithm (FBP) with similar exposure parameters. These algorithms allow an 80% reduction of the CTDIvol value while maintaining an acceptable visibility of low-contrast objects. However, the results obtained with each of the studied iterative algorithms differ.pl
dc.contributor.authorStaniszewska, Mariapl
dc.contributor.authorChrusciak, Dariuszpl
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T12:22:08Z
dc.date.available2018-01-05T12:22:08Z
dc.date.issued2017pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 797pl
dc.description.physical792-797pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume82pl
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/PJR.903557pl
dc.identifier.eissn1899-0967pl
dc.identifier.issn1733-134Xpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/48109
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enimage processingpl
dc.subject.encomputer-assistedpl
dc.subject.enradiation dosagepl
dc.subject.entomographypl
dc.subject.enx-ray computedpl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleIterative reconstruction as a method for optimisation of computed tomography procedurespl
dc.title.journalPolish Journal of Radiologypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-09T23:39:48Z
dc.abstract.enpl
Background: Computed tomography (CT) is still commonly regarded as a method that causes a high radiation exposure. For that reason, producers intensively try to find new solutions for dose reduction while maintaining a high diagnostic value of images. One of the recent strategies focuses on CT image reconstruction. Iterative reconstruction (IR) is an alternative for filtered back projection (FBP) that is commonly used today. The aim of the article is to demonstrate and compare the effects of two IR algorithms on dose value and image details. Material/Methods: Investigations were performed on two 128 multi-detector (MDCT) CT scanners: - iCT (Philips Healthcare with iDose4); - Definitions AS+ (Siemens Medical Solutions with SAFIRE system). The measurements involved: - image quality indicators for the CATPHAN 600 phantom; - dosimetric indicators of exposure (DLP i CTDIvol). Results: The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in the images reconstructed with IR and FBP were analysed, and the SNR(IR)/SNR(FBP) ratios were calculated and correlated with CTDIvol values. The effects of IR and FBP algorithms on low-contrast resolution were also compared in relation to CTDIvol values. The smallest diameter of supra-slice objects in the Catphan phantom were taken into consideration. Conclusions: Both iterative algorithms definitely improved the visibility of low-contrast objects in comparison to a standard algorithm (FBP) with similar exposure parameters. These algorithms allow an 80% reduction of the CTDIvol value while maintaining an acceptable visibility of low-contrast objects. However, the results obtained with each of the studied iterative algorithms differ.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Staniszewska, Maria
dc.contributor.authorpl
Chrusciak, Dariusz
dc.date.accessioned
2018-01-05T12:22:08Z
dc.date.available
2018-01-05T12:22:08Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2017
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 797
dc.description.physicalpl
792-797
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
82
dc.identifier.doipl
10.12659/PJR.903557
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1899-0967
dc.identifier.issnpl
1733-134X
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/48109
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
image processing
dc.subject.enpl
computer-assisted
dc.subject.enpl
radiation dosage
dc.subject.enpl
tomography
dc.subject.enpl
x-ray computed
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Iterative reconstruction as a method for optimisation of computed tomography procedures
dc.title.journalpl
Polish Journal of Radiology
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
7
Views per month
Views per city
Warsaw
4
Ashburn
1
Nantes
1
Downloads
staniszewska_chrusciak_iterative_reconstruction_as_a_method_for_optimisation_2017.pdf
29