Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Common but not single : conceptualising the EU as sui generis diplomacy
EU sui generis diplomacy
structural diplomacy
EU foreign and security policy
Bibliogr. s. 142
This chapter examines whether the European Union (EU) could be considered a sui generis diplomacy construct exclusively, or it is (becomes) a single diplomacy agent? The answer is: it depends on the perspective chosen. If we adopt an anlytical perspective, which allows to explain how foreign policy goals conflate at the level of state and non-state actors then it is possible to conceptualise the current EU diplomacy system in terms of a as sui generis one. In what follows Stepehen Keukeleire's structural diplomacy paradigm (2003, 2009) is applied to explain interrelational character of policy goals sourrounding the EU's diplomatic agenda-setting and its agency. The chapter first analyses the EU as non-state diplomacy in (still) state-centric diplomatic milieu. It then provides an insight into the EU's diplomacy major agency dilema, namely: efficiency vs. internal cohesion. In concluding remarks, the chapter draws prospects for the EU sui generis diplomacy in the post-order times.
| dc.abstract.en | This chapter examines whether the European Union (EU) could be considered a sui generis diplomacy construct exclusively, or it is (becomes) a single diplomacy agent? The answer is: it depends on the perspective chosen. If we adopt an anlytical perspective, which allows to explain how foreign policy goals conflate at the level of state and non-state actors then it is possible to conceptualise the current EU diplomacy system in terms of a as sui generis one. In what follows Stepehen Keukeleire's structural diplomacy paradigm (2003, 2009) is applied to explain interrelational character of policy goals sourrounding the EU's diplomatic agenda-setting and its agency. The chapter first analyses the EU as non-state diplomacy in (still) state-centric diplomatic milieu. It then provides an insight into the EU's diplomacy major agency dilema, namely: efficiency vs. internal cohesion. In concluding remarks, the chapter draws prospects for the EU sui generis diplomacy in the post-order times. | pl |
| dc.affiliation | Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych : Instytut Europeistyki | pl |
| dc.contributor.author | Pożarlik, Grzegorz - 131537 | pl |
| dc.contributor.editor | Gura, Radovan | pl |
| dc.contributor.editor | Rouet, Gilles | pl |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-21T14:06:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-21T14:06:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | pl |
| dc.description.additional | Bibliogr. s. 142 | pl |
| dc.description.physical | 131-142 | pl |
| dc.description.publication | 0,6 | pl |
| dc.description.series | Local & Global (Paris) | |
| dc.description.seriesnumber | 53 | |
| dc.identifier.bookweblink | https://www.editions-harmattan.fr/livre-pratiques_du_em_soft_power_em_radovan_gura_gilles_rouet-9782343186511-64113.html | pl |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-2-343-18651-1 | pl |
| dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / O | pl |
| dc.identifier.serieseissn | 2495-9308 | |
| dc.identifier.seriesissn | 2257-3690 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/149589 | |
| dc.language | eng | pl |
| dc.language.container | fre | pl |
| dc.pubinfo | Paris : L'Harmattan | pl |
| dc.publisher.ministerial | Éditions l'Harmattan | pl |
| dc.rights | Dodaję tylko opis bibliograficzny | * |
| dc.rights.licence | Bez licencji otwartego dostępu | |
| dc.source.integrator | false | |
| dc.subject.en | EU sui generis diplomacy | pl |
| dc.subject.en | structural diplomacy | pl |
| dc.subject.en | EU foreign and security policy | pl |
| dc.subtype | Article | pl |
| dc.title | Common but not single : conceptualising the EU as sui generis diplomacy | pl |
| dc.title.container | Pratiques du soft power | pl |
| dc.type | BookSection | pl |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |