N/A

N/A

The thesis will look at some of the setbacks of the United Nations form the perspective of work done by its member-states. The main idea is to stop seeking fault in the organisation itself, and start looking at the people who are part of it, thus showing that if the policies of nation-states followed with those of the UN, then long-term goals set by the organisation would be within our reach. Of course, the basics of the structural elements were analysed, how each of the main bodies effects the other, as in the case of excepting new member-states into the structure. Then the paper will look at the case of Israel and Palestine to show the flaws of the veto power in the hands of a strong supporting country and how that affects peace process. After which the closed case of the Rwandan Genocide will be addressed, not to look at the failure, but rather to see the steps taken by the UN in order to not repeat the mistake. Finally, the thesis will look into the Refugee Crisis of Syria, to switch focus from UNSC and UNGA process (with direct nation-state involvement) to the non politicised organisations directly entrusted with the issue of human displacement, herein the conclusion drawn is that, in fact, while nations continue to hinder the resolution of these subjects, the UN’s immense adaptation capabilities help relieve the pressure and follow their mandate. In the end, the conclusion drawn was that “All the world’s a stage” is in fact the current principle for most member-states within the UN, not enough participation within the ideas and programs that do not directly concern the nation-states, and yet the United Nations persevere and adapt to the lack of ongoing involvement.