Zabezpieczenie roszczeń polegające na zakazie publikacji w sprawach o ochronę dóbr osobistych

2014
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enOn 3 May 2012 an extensive amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure came into effect by the force of the Act of 16 September 2011 on the Amendment to the Act on the Code of Civil Procedure and some other acts of law. Following the amendment the regulation in Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure determining premises of admissibility of granting injunction consisting of prohibiting publications in cases of protection of personal rights has been changed. The amendment also introduced a maximum period for which the injunction may be granted as well as conditions of its prolongation. This article provides an analysis of the introduced legal regulation in order to answer the question if the change was of editorial nature only or if it affected tightening or easing the premises determining issuing the injunction. Therefore, it was indispensable to compare the substance of Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure before and after its amending on the basis of a statement on deduction. It was also purposeful to precise the term 'public interest', which constitutes a negative premise of granting the injunction consisting of prohibiting publication, as well as to discuss rules and procedures of prolonging the period for which the injunction involving prohibiting publication was granted.pl
dc.contributor.authorZawadzka, Zofiapl
dc.date.accession2019-10-12pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-12T08:20:25Z
dc.date.available2019-10-12T08:20:25Z
dc.date.issued2014pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical65-78pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/yp8j-4x31pl
dc.identifier.issn1641-1609pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84814
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/tpp_1-2014_zawadzka.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleZabezpieczenie roszczeń polegające na zakazie publikacji w sprawach o ochronę dóbr osobistychpl
dc.title.alternativeThe injunction consisting of prohibiting publication in cases of protection of personal rightspl
dc.title.journalTransformacje Prawa Prywatnegopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
On 3 May 2012 an extensive amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure came into effect by the force of the Act of 16 September 2011 on the Amendment to the Act on the Code of Civil Procedure and some other acts of law. Following the amendment the regulation in Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure determining premises of admissibility of granting injunction consisting of prohibiting publications in cases of protection of personal rights has been changed. The amendment also introduced a maximum period for which the injunction may be granted as well as conditions of its prolongation. This article provides an analysis of the introduced legal regulation in order to answer the question if the change was of editorial nature only or if it affected tightening or easing the premises determining issuing the injunction. Therefore, it was indispensable to compare the substance of Article 755 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure before and after its amending on the basis of a statement on deduction. It was also purposeful to precise the term 'public interest', which constitutes a negative premise of granting the injunction consisting of prohibiting publication, as well as to discuss rules and procedures of prolonging the period for which the injunction involving prohibiting publication was granted.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Zawadzka, Zofia
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-10-12
dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-12T08:20:25Z
dc.date.available
2019-10-12T08:20:25Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2014
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
65-78
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/yp8j-4x31
dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84814
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/tpp_1-2014_zawadzka.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Zabezpieczenie roszczeń polegające na zakazie publikacji w sprawach o ochronę dóbr osobistych
dc.title.alternativepl
The injunction consisting of prohibiting publication in cases of protection of personal rights
dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
30
Views per month
Views per city
Ashburn
6
Dublin
3
Dawidy Bankowe
2
San Jose
2
Wroclaw
2
Athens
1
Borety
1
Krakow
1
Shanghai
1
Sydney
1
Downloads
zawadzka_zabezpieczenie_roszczen_polegajace_na_zakazie_publikacji_2014.odt
23
zawadzka_zabezpieczenie_roszczen_polegajace_na_zakazie_publikacji_2014.pdf
9