Hume’s argument concerning induction : skeptical or explanatory?

2010
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThe essay deals with problems that emerge in new interpretations of Hume’s famous argument concerning induction. In modern Hume scholarship there is a growing tendency to view Hume’s argument not as reasoning concerning the evidential value of our inductions but rather as a kind of explanation of the cognitive process of making causal inferences. The essay describes the main tenets of two currently dominant interpretations (skeptical and explanatory). In addition to discussing both interpretations, the article engages in a discussion about the meaning of Hume’s argument by confronting the old skeptical reading of Hume with new interpretations. My contribution to the discussion consists of two arguments against the explanatory tradition of viewing Hume’s argument.
dc.contributor.authorMiech, Paweł
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-03T08:46:01Z
dc.date.available2026-09-03T08:46:01Z
dc.date.createdat2026-09-03T08:46:01Zen
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 12-13
dc.description.number24
dc.description.physical1-13
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.13153/diam.24.2010.390
dc.identifier.issn1733-5566
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/581403
dc.languageeng
dc.language.containerpol
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integratorfalse
dc.subtypeArticle
dc.titleHume’s argument concerning induction : skeptical or explanatory?
dc.title.journalDiametros
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
dc.abstract.en
The essay deals with problems that emerge in new interpretations of Hume’s famous argument concerning induction. In modern Hume scholarship there is a growing tendency to view Hume’s argument not as reasoning concerning the evidential value of our inductions but rather as a kind of explanation of the cognitive process of making causal inferences. The essay describes the main tenets of two currently dominant interpretations (skeptical and explanatory). In addition to discussing both interpretations, the article engages in a discussion about the meaning of Hume’s argument by confronting the old skeptical reading of Hume with new interpretations. My contribution to the discussion consists of two arguments against the explanatory tradition of viewing Hume’s argument.
dc.contributor.author
Miech, Paweł
dc.date.accessioned
2026-09-03T08:46:01Z
dc.date.available
2026-09-03T08:46:01Z
dc.date.createdaten
2026-09-03T08:46:01Z
dc.date.issued
2010
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additional
Bibliogr. s. 12-13
dc.description.number
24
dc.description.physical
1-13
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi
10.13153/diam.24.2010.390
dc.identifier.issn
1733-5566
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/581403
dc.language
eng
dc.language.container
pol
dc.rights
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integrator
false
dc.subtype
Article
dc.title
Hume’s argument concerning induction : skeptical or explanatory?
dc.title.journal
Diametros
dc.type
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeen
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
5
Views per month
Views per city
Częstochowa
5
Downloads
miech_humes_argument_concerning_induction_2010.PDF
1