Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : expectations versus possibilities : problem concerning clinician-radiographer, and radiographer-radiographer communication

2014
journal article
review article
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-10T01:10:24Z
dc.abstract.enAs the number of MRI laboratories equipped with resonance systems featuring magnetic field strengths of more than one Tesla as well as coils dedicated to breast examinations increases, such examinations are being made at increasing frequency. Clinicians expect the summaries to include exhaustive information concerning the topography of detected lesions as well as approximate staging of the disease process, which helps them in making decisions regarding further management. On the other hand, radiographers performing medical check-ups, expect the previous examination summary to include a wide range of information facilitating comparative analysis and evaluation of scan efficacy. Undoubtedly, breast MR offers an opportunity to obtain aforementioned information. However, the indispensable requirement for preparation of such summary is radiographer's awareness of the expectations being raised. We have to face the difficult task of standardizing the summaries, and even more than that, of making our colleagues aware of the importance of each sentence included in or excluded from the summary. This article is an attempt to present the correct form of a medical examination summary which should include data concerning former diagnostic examinations, detailed description of morphology as well as the location of lesions being diagnosed and suspected of malignant character together with the assessment of their relation to the skin and fascia as well as infiltration of fascia and chest wall. The essential requirement is the analysis of the contrast enhancement curve as well as the appraisal of diffusion limitation with numerical ADC values. Assessment of lymph nodes is also required, as is the classification of lesions into appropriate BI RADS in summary conclusions. In order to avoid significant differences in the phrasing of summaries prepared at particular centers as well as by particular individuals, a general scheme forming a basis for the summary should be adopted or else, a list of questions to be answered in order to make the summary complete, comprehensible and unambiguous should be developed. Such procedures would certainly make the radiologist's work easier; it would also ensure radiographers being better understood by fellow radiographers and clinicians.pl
dc.contributor.authorGancarz, Józefpl
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-18T11:16:04Z
dc.date.available2017-08-18T11:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2014pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. S49pl
dc.description.numberSupplementpl
dc.description.physicalS45-49pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume79pl
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/PJR.890597pl
dc.identifier.eissn1899-0967pl
dc.identifier.issn1733-134Xpl
dc.identifier.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/43243
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enbreastpl
dc.subject.enreportpl
dc.subject.enmagnetic resonance imagingpl
dc.subtypeReviewArticlepl
dc.titleBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : expectations versus possibilities : problem concerning clinician-radiographer, and radiographer-radiographer communicationpl
dc.title.journalPolish Journal of Radiologypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-10T01:10:24Z
dc.abstract.enpl
As the number of MRI laboratories equipped with resonance systems featuring magnetic field strengths of more than one Tesla as well as coils dedicated to breast examinations increases, such examinations are being made at increasing frequency. Clinicians expect the summaries to include exhaustive information concerning the topography of detected lesions as well as approximate staging of the disease process, which helps them in making decisions regarding further management. On the other hand, radiographers performing medical check-ups, expect the previous examination summary to include a wide range of information facilitating comparative analysis and evaluation of scan efficacy. Undoubtedly, breast MR offers an opportunity to obtain aforementioned information. However, the indispensable requirement for preparation of such summary is radiographer's awareness of the expectations being raised. We have to face the difficult task of standardizing the summaries, and even more than that, of making our colleagues aware of the importance of each sentence included in or excluded from the summary. This article is an attempt to present the correct form of a medical examination summary which should include data concerning former diagnostic examinations, detailed description of morphology as well as the location of lesions being diagnosed and suspected of malignant character together with the assessment of their relation to the skin and fascia as well as infiltration of fascia and chest wall. The essential requirement is the analysis of the contrast enhancement curve as well as the appraisal of diffusion limitation with numerical ADC values. Assessment of lymph nodes is also required, as is the classification of lesions into appropriate BI RADS in summary conclusions. In order to avoid significant differences in the phrasing of summaries prepared at particular centers as well as by particular individuals, a general scheme forming a basis for the summary should be adopted or else, a list of questions to be answered in order to make the summary complete, comprehensible and unambiguous should be developed. Such procedures would certainly make the radiologist's work easier; it would also ensure radiographers being better understood by fellow radiographers and clinicians.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Gancarz, Józef
dc.date.accessioned
2017-08-18T11:16:04Z
dc.date.available
2017-08-18T11:16:04Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2014
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. S49
dc.description.numberpl
Supplement
dc.description.physicalpl
S45-49
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
79
dc.identifier.doipl
10.12659/PJR.890597
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1899-0967
dc.identifier.issnpl
1733-134X
dc.identifier.uri
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/43243
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
breast
dc.subject.enpl
report
dc.subject.enpl
magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subtypepl
ReviewArticle
dc.titlepl
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : expectations versus possibilities : problem concerning clinician-radiographer, and radiographer-radiographer communication
dc.title.journalpl
Polish Journal of Radiology
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
7
Views per month
Views per city
Pekanbaru
4
Casablanca
2
Melbourne
1
Downloads
gancarz_breast_magnetic_resonance_imaging_mri_expectations_versus_possibilities_2014.pdf
60