Same or different? : theory of mind among children with and without disabilities

2018
journal article
article
29
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-10T01:11:09Z
dc.abstract.enAssessing theory of mind (ToM) with reliable and valid measures is important, as ToM plays a significant role in children's social and cognitive functioning. With this in mind, a thorough analysis of the Theory of Mind scale and the Faux Pas Recognition Test was conducted. Over 750 school-age (M age = 7.7) children with disabilities (mild intellectual disability, hearing impairment) and without disabilities took part in our study. The psychometric properties of measures in these groups of children were checked, using confirmatory item factor analysis, reliability, and validity analyses. Thanks to groups' invariance it was possible to compare mean results of children in the groups. Both measures showed well-fitted models with acceptable goodness of fit as well as scalar and strict invariance. An IRT analysis showed significant differences in the difficulty of the tasks in all groups, but the same order of passing tasks in comparison to other studies, conducted in Western countries, has been observed. Our results showed that the tasks were the easiest for children without disabilities, and most difficult for children with mild intellectual disability. We obtained significant and positive correlations between ToM and social skills and language abilities. The findings are discussed in relation to results from other studies in the field.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Pedagogikipl
dc.contributor.authorSmogorzewska, Joannapl
dc.contributor.authorSzumski, Grzegorzpl
dc.contributor.authorGrygiel, Paweł - 394072 pl
dc.date.accession2018-10-18pl
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T12:35:28Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T12:35:28Z
dc.date.issued2018pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. [16-20]pl
dc.description.number13 (10)pl
dc.description.publication1pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.articleide0202553pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0202553pl
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/59880
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202553&type=printablepl
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integratorfalse
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleSame or different? : theory of mind among children with and without disabilitiespl
dc.title.journalPLoS ONEpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-10T01:11:09Z
dc.abstract.enpl
Assessing theory of mind (ToM) with reliable and valid measures is important, as ToM plays a significant role in children's social and cognitive functioning. With this in mind, a thorough analysis of the Theory of Mind scale and the Faux Pas Recognition Test was conducted. Over 750 school-age (M age = 7.7) children with disabilities (mild intellectual disability, hearing impairment) and without disabilities took part in our study. The psychometric properties of measures in these groups of children were checked, using confirmatory item factor analysis, reliability, and validity analyses. Thanks to groups' invariance it was possible to compare mean results of children in the groups. Both measures showed well-fitted models with acceptable goodness of fit as well as scalar and strict invariance. An IRT analysis showed significant differences in the difficulty of the tasks in all groups, but the same order of passing tasks in comparison to other studies, conducted in Western countries, has been observed. Our results showed that the tasks were the easiest for children without disabilities, and most difficult for children with mild intellectual disability. We obtained significant and positive correlations between ToM and social skills and language abilities. The findings are discussed in relation to results from other studies in the field.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Pedagogiki
dc.contributor.authorpl
Smogorzewska, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorpl
Szumski, Grzegorz
dc.contributor.authorpl
Grygiel, Paweł - 394072
dc.date.accessionpl
2018-10-18
dc.date.accessioned
2018-11-09T12:35:28Z
dc.date.available
2018-11-09T12:35:28Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2018
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. [16-20]
dc.description.numberpl
13 (10)
dc.description.publicationpl
1
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.articleidpl
e0202553
dc.identifier.doipl
10.1371/journal.pone.0202553
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1932-6203
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/59880
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202553&type=printable
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.source.integrator
false
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Same or different? : theory of mind among children with and without disabilities
dc.title.journalpl
PLoS ONE
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
1
Views per month
Views per city
Frankfurt am Main
1
Downloads
smogorzewska_szumski_grygiel_same_or_different_2018.pdf
45
smogorzewska_szumski_grygiel_same_or_different_2018.odt
25