The nuclear technology debate returns : narratives about nuclear power in post-Fukushima Japanese films

2017
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThe presented article revolves around the widespread debate on the Fukushima catastrophe in Japanese cinematography and the artists' responses to the incident. They give the viewers clues on how to understand the reasons and results of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, as well as how to perceive nuclear technology after the catastrophe. The author analyses the chosen post-Fukushima films, points out the recurring depictions, and deliberates on the ways of presenting nuclear power. The analysis starts with a brief comparison of post-Hiroshima and post-Fukushima cinematography. The author then focuses on activists' art in the form of anti-nuclear agitation (Nuclear Japan, 2014 by Hiroyuki Kawai) and pictures that can be classified as shōshimin-eiga: Kebo no kuni (The Land of Hope, 2012) and Leji (Homeland, 2014). The third part of the article puts emphasis on the description of the catastrophe as a "new beginning", as Takashi Murakami presents it in Mememe no kurage (Jellyfish Eye, 2013). The debate on nuclear technology also appears in the remake of the story about the best-known Japanese monster, Godzilla, reactivated by Hideaki Anno in the post-Fukushima film Shin Gojira (New Godzilla, 2016). The last part of the paper presents the Western point of view and covers analysis of films such as Alain de Halleux's Welcome to Fukushima (2013), Doris Dörrie's Grüße aus Fukushima (Fukushima, My Love, 2016) or Matteo Gagliardi's Fukushima: A Nuclear Story (2015).pl
dc.affiliationWydział Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznejpl
dc.contributor.authorKiejziewicz, Agnieszka - 361485 pl
dc.date.accession2017-10-03pl
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-03T08:03:30Z
dc.date.available2017-10-03T08:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2017pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical117-131pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume2pl
dc.identifier.eissn2451-5116pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/44669
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://transmissions.edu.pl/the-nuclear-technology-debate-returns-narratives-about-nuclear-power-in-post-fukushima-japanese-films/pl
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.licenceInna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enFukushimapl
dc.subject.ennuclear powerpl
dc.subject.enpost-Fukushima filmpl
dc.subject.enJapanese cinemapl
dc.subject.encatastrophepl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleThe nuclear technology debate returns : narratives about nuclear power in post-Fukushima Japanese filmspl
dc.title.journalTransMissionspl
dc.title.volumeWar&technologypl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
The presented article revolves around the widespread debate on the Fukushima catastrophe in Japanese cinematography and the artists' responses to the incident. They give the viewers clues on how to understand the reasons and results of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, as well as how to perceive nuclear technology after the catastrophe. The author analyses the chosen post-Fukushima films, points out the recurring depictions, and deliberates on the ways of presenting nuclear power. The analysis starts with a brief comparison of post-Hiroshima and post-Fukushima cinematography. The author then focuses on activists' art in the form of anti-nuclear agitation (Nuclear Japan, 2014 by Hiroyuki Kawai) and pictures that can be classified as shōshimin-eiga: Kebo no kuni (The Land of Hope, 2012) and Leji (Homeland, 2014). The third part of the article puts emphasis on the description of the catastrophe as a "new beginning", as Takashi Murakami presents it in Mememe no kurage (Jellyfish Eye, 2013). The debate on nuclear technology also appears in the remake of the story about the best-known Japanese monster, Godzilla, reactivated by Hideaki Anno in the post-Fukushima film Shin Gojira (New Godzilla, 2016). The last part of the paper presents the Western point of view and covers analysis of films such as Alain de Halleux's Welcome to Fukushima (2013), Doris Dörrie's Grüße aus Fukushima (Fukushima, My Love, 2016) or Matteo Gagliardi's Fukushima: A Nuclear Story (2015).
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej
dc.contributor.authorpl
Kiejziewicz, Agnieszka - 361485
dc.date.accessionpl
2017-10-03
dc.date.accessioned
2017-10-03T08:03:30Z
dc.date.available
2017-10-03T08:03:30Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2017
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
117-131
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
2
dc.identifier.eissnpl
2451-5116
dc.identifier.uri
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/44669
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://transmissions.edu.pl/the-nuclear-technology-debate-returns-narratives-about-nuclear-power-in-post-fukushima-japanese-films/
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.licence
Inna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
Fukushima
dc.subject.enpl
nuclear power
dc.subject.enpl
post-Fukushima film
dc.subject.enpl
Japanese cinema
dc.subject.enpl
catastrophe
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
The nuclear technology debate returns : narratives about nuclear power in post-Fukushima Japanese films
dc.title.journalpl
TransMissions
dc.title.volumepl
War&technology
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
41
Views per month
Views per city
Frankfurt am Main
5
Cambe
3
Buenos Aires
2
Ho Chi Minh City
2
Mannheim
2
Nitra
2
Toronto
2
Adelaide
1
Alora
1
Berlin
1
Downloads
Kiejziewicz_The-nuclear-technology-debate-returns(1).pdf
148