Criminal responsibility and mental incompetence

2018
working paper
review article
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-09T20:03:52Z
dc.abstract.enThe so-called standard (that is, adopted in nearly all legal systems) model of the regulation of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent presupposes that: (a) freedom is a condition of criminal responsibility, (b) the concept of mental illness/disorder is fully legitimate; (c) mental illness/disorder in conjunction with its psychological effects (which are certain mental - cognitive and/or volitional - incapacities or at least serious impairments of certain mental capacities) constitute an exculpatory circumstance or at least a circumstance mitigating the penalty for committing an offence. In this paper an attempt will be made at presenting the standard model in a broader context, depicting other possible models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent. Models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent are determined by the conceptions of criminal responsibility and of mental illness, thus I shall present the different views of criminal responsibility in section 2, and the conceptions of mental illness in section 3. Section 4 will be devoted to the presentation of the models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent, and section 5 will consist of evaluation of the models and some concluding remarks.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Filozofii Prawa i Etyki Prawniczejpl
dc.contributor.authorZałuski, Wojciech - 132854 pl
dc.contributor.institutionInterdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJpl
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T12:10:27Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T12:10:27Z
dc.date.issued2018pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physical1-23pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/t665-1243pl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/259592
dc.languageengpl
dc.referencesBasaglia F. (ed.), (1973), L’Istituzione Negata, Torino: Einaudi.pl
dc.referencesBaumeister R. F. (2001), Evil. Inside Human Violence and Cruelty, New York: Henry Holt and Company.pl
dc.referencesCooper D. (1967), Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry, London: Tavistock.pl
dc.referencesDryla O. (2018), Pojęcie doskonalenia w sporach o cele medycyny, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.pl
dc.referencesErickson P. E., Erickson S. K. (2008), Crime, Punishment, and Mental Illness, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.pl
dc.referencesEshleman A. (2016), Moral Responsibility, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).pl
dc.referencesFoucault M. (1971, 1961), Madness and Civilization, London: Tavistock.pl
dc.referencesGoffman E. (1961), Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, New York: Random House.pl
dc.referencesHart H. L. A. (2008, 1968), Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.referencesKendell R. E. (2005), The Myth of Mental Illness [in:] Szasz Under Fire: The Psychiatric Abolitionist Faces His Critics, J. Schaler (ed.), Illinois: Open Court, 29-48.pl
dc.referencesKotowicz Z. (1997), R.D. Laing and the Paths of Anti-Psychiatry, London and New York: Routledge.pl
dc.referencesLaing R. D. (1967), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.pl
dc.referencesLaing R. D. (1969, 1960), The Divided Self. An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.pl
dc.referencesLaing R. D. (1985), Wisdom, Madness and Folly. The Making of a Psychiatrist, London: Macmillan.pl
dc.referencesRoss A. (1975), On Guilt, Responsibility, and Punishment, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.pl
dc.referencesShorter E. (2011), Still Tilting at Windmills: Commentary on The Myth of Mental Illness, “The Psychiatrist” 35(5), 183-184.pl
dc.referencesSiegler M., Osmond H., Mann H. (1969), Laing’s Models of Madness, “The British Journal of Psychiatry” 115(525), 947-958.pl
dc.referencesStrawson G. (1994), The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility, “Philosophical Studies” 75(1-2), 5-24.pl
dc.referencesStrawson P. (1962), Freedom and Resentment [in:] Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 48, G. Watson (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-25.pl
dc.referencesSzasz T. (1974, 1960), The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, New York: Harper&Row Publishers.pl
dc.referencesSzasz T. (1976), Anti-Psychiatry: The Paradigm of a Plundered Mind, “New Review” 3(29).pl
dc.referencesTorrey E. T. (1997), Out of the Shadows. Confronting America’s Mental Illness, London: Wiley.pl
dc.referencesTwardowski K. (1983), Etyka i prawo karne wobec zagadnienia wolności woli, “Etyka” 20, 123-157.pl
dc.referencesWakefield J. C. (1992), The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary Between Biological Facts and Social Values, “American Psychologist” 47(3), 373-88.pl
dc.referencesWootton B. (1963), Crime and the Criminal Law, London: Steven&Sons.pl
dc.referencesZaremba M. (2008), Sceny łowieckie z domu wariatów, transl. W. Chudoba [in:] Polski hydraulik i inne opowieści ze Szwecji, Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne, 175-229.pl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceInna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte repozytorium
dc.subject.enincompatibilist conceptions of criminal responsibilitypl
dc.subject.enpartial-positive-equalization modelpl
dc.subject.encriminal responsibility in mental illnesspl
dc.subject.enanti-psychiatrypl
dc.subtypeReviewArticlepl
dc.titleCriminal responsibility and mental incompetencepl
dc.title.alternativeOdpowiedzialność karna a niepoczytalnośćpl
dc.typeWorkingPaperpl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-09T20:03:52Z
dc.abstract.enpl
The so-called standard (that is, adopted in nearly all legal systems) model of the regulation of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent presupposes that: (a) freedom is a condition of criminal responsibility, (b) the concept of mental illness/disorder is fully legitimate; (c) mental illness/disorder in conjunction with its psychological effects (which are certain mental - cognitive and/or volitional - incapacities or at least serious impairments of certain mental capacities) constitute an exculpatory circumstance or at least a circumstance mitigating the penalty for committing an offence. In this paper an attempt will be made at presenting the standard model in a broader context, depicting other possible models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent. Models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent are determined by the conceptions of criminal responsibility and of mental illness, thus I shall present the different views of criminal responsibility in section 2, and the conceptions of mental illness in section 3. Section 4 will be devoted to the presentation of the models of criminal responsibility of the mentally incompetent, and section 5 will consist of evaluation of the models and some concluding remarks.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Filozofii Prawa i Etyki Prawniczej
dc.contributor.authorpl
Załuski, Wojciech - 132854
dc.contributor.institutionpl
Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJ
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-04T12:10:27Z
dc.date.available
2021-01-04T12:10:27Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2018
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physicalpl
1-23
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/t665-1243
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/259592
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.referencespl
Basaglia F. (ed.), (1973), L’Istituzione Negata, Torino: Einaudi.
dc.referencespl
Baumeister R. F. (2001), Evil. Inside Human Violence and Cruelty, New York: Henry Holt and Company.
dc.referencespl
Cooper D. (1967), Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry, London: Tavistock.
dc.referencespl
Dryla O. (2018), Pojęcie doskonalenia w sporach o cele medycyny, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
dc.referencespl
Erickson P. E., Erickson S. K. (2008), Crime, Punishment, and Mental Illness, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
dc.referencespl
Eshleman A. (2016), Moral Responsibility, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
dc.referencespl
Foucault M. (1971, 1961), Madness and Civilization, London: Tavistock.
dc.referencespl
Goffman E. (1961), Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, New York: Random House.
dc.referencespl
Hart H. L. A. (2008, 1968), Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.referencespl
Kendell R. E. (2005), The Myth of Mental Illness [in:] Szasz Under Fire: The Psychiatric Abolitionist Faces His Critics, J. Schaler (ed.), Illinois: Open Court, 29-48.
dc.referencespl
Kotowicz Z. (1997), R.D. Laing and the Paths of Anti-Psychiatry, London and New York: Routledge.
dc.referencespl
Laing R. D. (1967), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
dc.referencespl
Laing R. D. (1969, 1960), The Divided Self. An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
dc.referencespl
Laing R. D. (1985), Wisdom, Madness and Folly. The Making of a Psychiatrist, London: Macmillan.
dc.referencespl
Ross A. (1975), On Guilt, Responsibility, and Punishment, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
dc.referencespl
Shorter E. (2011), Still Tilting at Windmills: Commentary on The Myth of Mental Illness, “The Psychiatrist” 35(5), 183-184.
dc.referencespl
Siegler M., Osmond H., Mann H. (1969), Laing’s Models of Madness, “The British Journal of Psychiatry” 115(525), 947-958.
dc.referencespl
Strawson G. (1994), The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility, “Philosophical Studies” 75(1-2), 5-24.
dc.referencespl
Strawson P. (1962), Freedom and Resentment [in:] Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 48, G. Watson (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-25.
dc.referencespl
Szasz T. (1974, 1960), The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct, New York: Harper&Row Publishers.
dc.referencespl
Szasz T. (1976), Anti-Psychiatry: The Paradigm of a Plundered Mind, “New Review” 3(29).
dc.referencespl
Torrey E. T. (1997), Out of the Shadows. Confronting America’s Mental Illness, London: Wiley.
dc.referencespl
Twardowski K. (1983), Etyka i prawo karne wobec zagadnienia wolności woli, “Etyka” 20, 123-157.
dc.referencespl
Wakefield J. C. (1992), The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary Between Biological Facts and Social Values, “American Psychologist” 47(3), 373-88.
dc.referencespl
Wootton B. (1963), Crime and the Criminal Law, London: Steven&Sons.
dc.referencespl
Zaremba M. (2008), Sceny łowieckie z domu wariatów, transl. W. Chudoba [in:] Polski hydraulik i inne opowieści ze Szwecji, Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne, 175-229.
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
Inna otwarta licencja
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte repozytorium
dc.subject.enpl
incompatibilist conceptions of criminal responsibility
dc.subject.enpl
partial-positive-equalization model
dc.subject.enpl
criminal responsibility in mental illness
dc.subject.enpl
anti-psychiatry
dc.subtypepl
ReviewArticle
dc.titlepl
Criminal responsibility and mental incompetence
dc.title.alternativepl
Odpowiedzialność karna a niepoczytalność
dc.typepl
WorkingPaper
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
60
Views per month
Views per city
Dublin
10
Ashburn
5
Krakow
4
Lomé
2
New York
2
North Shields
2
Szczecin
2
Warsaw
2
Wroclaw
2
Bialystok
1
Downloads
zaluski_criminal_responsibility_2018.pdf
52