Abuzywność klauzul umownych w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-260/18

2021
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThis article deals with the issues related to the protection of consumers who are a party to an agreements containing abusive clauses. The main purpose of the of the paper is to answer the question of how - in the light of the CJEU’s judgment in C-260/18 case - the legal position of the consumer is shaped from the moment of concluding an agreement containing abusive clauses to obtaining a final judgment. Firstly, the authors present the views on the character of the sanction under Article 3851 of the Polish Civil Code expressed so far in the Polish literature. Secondly, the justification to the CJEU judgment in case C-260/18 is analysed. The main part of the text focuses on the position of the consumer who is a party to a contract containing abusive clauses. In particular, the paper focuses on the legal character of a statement made by a consumer concerning willingness to take advantage of protection against abusive clauses. The pro-EU interpretation of the rules and the current CJEU case law indicate that it is reasonable to assume the procedural nature of the statement made by the consumer. In a contentious situation, the procedural nature of the statement results directly from the need for the statement to be confirmed by the court and the existence of abusive clauses to be confirmed at the same time. The article is also a contribution in the discussion on the current status of the consumer law both in Poland and in European Union and not only in respect of the indexed or denominated credits.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracjipl
dc.contributor.authorJurzak, Kamilpl
dc.contributor.authorMalina, Aleksandrapl
dc.contributor.authorPiotrowski, Dariuszpl
dc.contributor.authorJanas, Tomaszpl
dc.contributor.authorAugustyn, Jakubpl
dc.date.accession2021-07-02pl
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T06:32:28Z
dc.date.available2021-07-02T06:32:28Z
dc.date.issued2021pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 30-32pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.physical7-33pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/tzeq-6y37pl
dc.identifier.issn1641-1609pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/276046
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/TPP-2-2021-Jurzak-Malina-Piotrowski-Janas-Augustyn.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enabusive clausespl
dc.subject.enconsumentpl
dc.subject.enCourt of Justicepl
dc.subject.enCJEUpl
dc.subject.enDziubakpl
dc.subject.enindexed loanpl
dc.subject.enlegal effectspl
dc.subject.enineffectivenesspl
dc.subject.ennullitypl
dc.subject.plklauzule abuzywnepl
dc.subject.plkonsumentpl
dc.subject.plTrybunał Sprawiedliwościpl
dc.subject.plTSUEpl
dc.subject.plDziubakpl
dc.subject.plkredyty indeksowanepl
dc.subject.plskutki prawnepl
dc.subject.plbezskutecznośćpl
dc.subject.plnieważnośćpl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleAbuzywność klauzul umownych w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-260/18pl
dc.title.alternativeAbusiveness of the contractual clauses following the judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-260/18pl
dc.title.journalTransformacje Prawa Prywatnegopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
This article deals with the issues related to the protection of consumers who are a party to an agreements containing abusive clauses. The main purpose of the of the paper is to answer the question of how - in the light of the CJEU’s judgment in C-260/18 case - the legal position of the consumer is shaped from the moment of concluding an agreement containing abusive clauses to obtaining a final judgment. Firstly, the authors present the views on the character of the sanction under Article 3851 of the Polish Civil Code expressed so far in the Polish literature. Secondly, the justification to the CJEU judgment in case C-260/18 is analysed. The main part of the text focuses on the position of the consumer who is a party to a contract containing abusive clauses. In particular, the paper focuses on the legal character of a statement made by a consumer concerning willingness to take advantage of protection against abusive clauses. The pro-EU interpretation of the rules and the current CJEU case law indicate that it is reasonable to assume the procedural nature of the statement made by the consumer. In a contentious situation, the procedural nature of the statement results directly from the need for the statement to be confirmed by the court and the existence of abusive clauses to be confirmed at the same time. The article is also a contribution in the discussion on the current status of the consumer law both in Poland and in European Union and not only in respect of the indexed or denominated credits.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji
dc.contributor.authorpl
Jurzak, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorpl
Malina, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorpl
Piotrowski, Dariusz
dc.contributor.authorpl
Janas, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorpl
Augustyn, Jakub
dc.date.accessionpl
2021-07-02
dc.date.accessioned
2021-07-02T06:32:28Z
dc.date.available
2021-07-02T06:32:28Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2021
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 30-32
dc.description.numberpl
2
dc.description.physicalpl
7-33
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/tzeq-6y37
dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/276046
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/TPP-2-2021-Jurzak-Malina-Piotrowski-Janas-Augustyn.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
abusive clauses
dc.subject.enpl
consument
dc.subject.enpl
Court of Justice
dc.subject.enpl
CJEU
dc.subject.enpl
Dziubak
dc.subject.enpl
indexed loan
dc.subject.enpl
legal effects
dc.subject.enpl
ineffectiveness
dc.subject.enpl
nullity
dc.subject.plpl
klauzule abuzywne
dc.subject.plpl
konsument
dc.subject.plpl
Trybunał Sprawiedliwości
dc.subject.plpl
TSUE
dc.subject.plpl
Dziubak
dc.subject.plpl
kredyty indeksowane
dc.subject.plpl
skutki prawne
dc.subject.plpl
bezskuteczność
dc.subject.plpl
nieważność
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Abuzywność klauzul umownych w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-260/18
dc.title.alternativepl
Abusiveness of the contractual clauses following the judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-260/18
dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
54
Views per month
Views per city
Ashburn
9
Warsaw
5
Wroclaw
4
Dublin
3
Koszalin
2
Odense
2
Poznan
2
San Jose
2
The Hague
2
Bialystok
1
Downloads
jurzak_malina_piotrowski_janas_augustyn_abuzywnosc_klauzul_umownych_2021.pdf
84
jurzak_malina_piotrowski_janas_augustyn_abuzywnosc_klauzul_umownych_2021.odt
1