Computed tomography evaluation of variations in positions and measurements of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms : time to revise the diagnostic criteria for appendicitis

2023
journal article
article
1
dc.abstract.enPurpose: To estimate the frequency distribution of different anatomical positions, and to measure the diameter, wall thickness, and length of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms. Material and methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted among 1,575 patients, who had undergone computed tomography (CT) scan of abdomen for various non-appendicular signs and symptoms. Frequency of distribution of different anatomic locations and measurements of various morphologic parameters were recorded. Results: The most common location of appendix was retrocecal, followed by sub-cecal, post-ileal, and pelvic locations. The mean length of appendix was 66.7 mm (range, 6.3-123 mm), and the diameter was 6.3 mm (range, 2.8-11.3 mm). Diameter of > 6 mm was noted in 48.12% patients. The mean wall thickness was 2.37 mm, ranging 1.2-4.2 mm. The most common intra-luminal content was air-mixed with hypodense or hyperdense material observed in 70.5% of cases. Conclusions: Although an appendix with diameter less than 6 mm may be considered normal, a diameter above 6 mm has an overlap between a normal and inflamed appendix. Therefore, it should be considered in association with clinical and secondary findings to avoid overdiagnosis and unnecessary appendicectomies. We strongly recommend that diameter-based CT criteria to diagnose appendicitis should be revised and standardized.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Neha
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Prasant
dc.contributor.authorKumar Singh, Deepak
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Gaurav Raj
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-23T06:34:13Z
dc.date.available2024-07-23T06:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. e413-e414
dc.description.physicale407-e414
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume88
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/pjr.2023.131074
dc.identifier.issn1733-134X
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/389160
dc.languageeng
dc.language.containereng
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enCT
dc.subject.enappendicitis
dc.subject.enappendix
dc.subject.ennormal appendix
dc.subtypeArticle
dc.titleComputed tomography evaluation of variations in positions and measurements of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms : time to revise the diagnostic criteria for appendicitis
dc.title.journalPolish Journal of Radiology
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
dc.abstract.en
Purpose: To estimate the frequency distribution of different anatomical positions, and to measure the diameter, wall thickness, and length of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms. Material and methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted among 1,575 patients, who had undergone computed tomography (CT) scan of abdomen for various non-appendicular signs and symptoms. Frequency of distribution of different anatomic locations and measurements of various morphologic parameters were recorded. Results: The most common location of appendix was retrocecal, followed by sub-cecal, post-ileal, and pelvic locations. The mean length of appendix was 66.7 mm (range, 6.3-123 mm), and the diameter was 6.3 mm (range, 2.8-11.3 mm). Diameter of > 6 mm was noted in 48.12% patients. The mean wall thickness was 2.37 mm, ranging 1.2-4.2 mm. The most common intra-luminal content was air-mixed with hypodense or hyperdense material observed in 70.5% of cases. Conclusions: Although an appendix with diameter less than 6 mm may be considered normal, a diameter above 6 mm has an overlap between a normal and inflamed appendix. Therefore, it should be considered in association with clinical and secondary findings to avoid overdiagnosis and unnecessary appendicectomies. We strongly recommend that diameter-based CT criteria to diagnose appendicitis should be revised and standardized.
dc.contributor.author
Singh, Neha
dc.contributor.author
Agrawal, Prasant
dc.contributor.author
Kumar Singh, Deepak
dc.contributor.author
Agrawal, Gaurav Raj
dc.date.accessioned
2024-07-23T06:34:13Z
dc.date.available
2024-07-23T06:34:13Z
dc.date.issued
2023
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additional
Bibliogr. s. e413-e414
dc.description.physical
e407-e414
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume
88
dc.identifier.doi
10.5114/pjr.2023.131074
dc.identifier.issn
1733-134X
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/389160
dc.language
eng
dc.language.container
eng
dc.rights
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.en
CT
dc.subject.en
appendicitis
dc.subject.en
appendix
dc.subject.en
normal appendix
dc.subtype
Article
dc.title
Computed tomography evaluation of variations in positions and measurements of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms : time to revise the diagnostic criteria for appendicitis
dc.title.journal
Polish Journal of Radiology
dc.type
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.typeen
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
7
Views per month
Views per city
Krakow
5
Warsaw
1
Downloads
singh_et-al_computed_tomography_evaluation_of_variations_2023.pdf
7