Spór o Czang Kajszeka w historiografi i angielskojęzycznej

2011
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enChiang Kai-shek (Jiang Jieshi) (1887-1975), leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party, or the Kuomintang (KMT), remains the most controversial Chinese politician of the 20th century. It is also remarkable that until recently the extraordinarily copious English-language historiography of China could not show a well-researched, critical biography of the Chinese leader. Chiang’s reputation was fi rst established in the 1930s by sympathizers of the Chinese communists (eg. Edgar Snow and Harold Isaacs). The Second World War tended to enhance this favourable view. However, the communist victory in 1949 produced a wave of disillusionment with Chiang, which culminated in the highly critical judgment of the offi cial publication United States Relations with China (Washington 1949). This negative opinion was hardly modifi ed by subsequent revaluations of the achievements of the People’s Republic (eg. Chang Kia-ngau, John K. Chang, and Arthur N. Young). Their authors believed that Chiang Kai-shek’s ineptness resulted from his ignorance of economic issues. In the 1970s negative judgments became still harsher. A new school of historians led by Lloyd E. Eastman found Chiang corrupt, anti-democratic, and even not averse to fascism. Hung-mao Tien, Suzanne Pepper and Frank Dorn stressed his incompetence both as a politician and man of war. Practically everybody agreed that the achievements of the KMT regime were illusory. In Sterling Seagreave study, in many ways the most representative work of the new school, Chiang is denounced as a political criminal with links to the Chinese mafi a. A more balanced image of Chiang began to emerge in the early 1980s in the work of Robert Bedeski (Canada), Donald Gillin (USA) and Hans van de Ven (UK). They portray him as a statesman who tried to rebuild and modernize China. His efforts failed on the mainland, not least because of disloyalty of his American allies, yet proved to be highly successful on the island of Taiwan. However, the most impressive statement of such a well-balanced appraisal of Chiang Kai-shek’s political career has arrived with The Generalissimo (Cambridge, Mass. 2009), the fi rst full-length critical biography of the Chinese leader written by Jay Taylor.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Historycznypl
dc.contributor.authorPolit, Jakub - 131500 pl
dc.date.accession2019-07-05pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-05T11:43:19Z
dc.date.available2019-07-05T11:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2011pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimepo opublikowaniu
dc.description.number1 (213)pl
dc.description.physical59-79pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume54pl
dc.identifier.issn0025-1429pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/78603
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/110890/edition/96189/contentpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleSpór o Czang Kajszeka w historiografi i angielskojęzycznejpl
dc.title.alternativeChiang Kai-shek’s disputed reputation in anglophone historiographypl
dc.title.journalStudia Historycznepl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Chiang Kai-shek (Jiang Jieshi) (1887-1975), leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party, or the Kuomintang (KMT), remains the most controversial Chinese politician of the 20th century. It is also remarkable that until recently the extraordinarily copious English-language historiography of China could not show a well-researched, critical biography of the Chinese leader. Chiang’s reputation was fi rst established in the 1930s by sympathizers of the Chinese communists (eg. Edgar Snow and Harold Isaacs). The Second World War tended to enhance this favourable view. However, the communist victory in 1949 produced a wave of disillusionment with Chiang, which culminated in the highly critical judgment of the offi cial publication United States Relations with China (Washington 1949). This negative opinion was hardly modifi ed by subsequent revaluations of the achievements of the People’s Republic (eg. Chang Kia-ngau, John K. Chang, and Arthur N. Young). Their authors believed that Chiang Kai-shek’s ineptness resulted from his ignorance of economic issues. In the 1970s negative judgments became still harsher. A new school of historians led by Lloyd E. Eastman found Chiang corrupt, anti-democratic, and even not averse to fascism. Hung-mao Tien, Suzanne Pepper and Frank Dorn stressed his incompetence both as a politician and man of war. Practically everybody agreed that the achievements of the KMT regime were illusory. In Sterling Seagreave study, in many ways the most representative work of the new school, Chiang is denounced as a political criminal with links to the Chinese mafi a. A more balanced image of Chiang began to emerge in the early 1980s in the work of Robert Bedeski (Canada), Donald Gillin (USA) and Hans van de Ven (UK). They portray him as a statesman who tried to rebuild and modernize China. His efforts failed on the mainland, not least because of disloyalty of his American allies, yet proved to be highly successful on the island of Taiwan. However, the most impressive statement of such a well-balanced appraisal of Chiang Kai-shek’s political career has arrived with The Generalissimo (Cambridge, Mass. 2009), the fi rst full-length critical biography of the Chinese leader written by Jay Taylor.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Historyczny
dc.contributor.authorpl
Polit, Jakub - 131500
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-07-05
dc.date.accessioned
2019-07-05T11:43:19Z
dc.date.available
2019-07-05T11:43:19Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2011
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
po opublikowaniu
dc.description.numberpl
1 (213)
dc.description.physicalpl
59-79
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
54
dc.identifier.issnpl
0025-1429
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/78603
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/110890/edition/96189/content
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Spór o Czang Kajszeka w historiografi i angielskojęzycznej
dc.title.alternativepl
Chiang Kai-shek’s disputed reputation in anglophone historiography
dc.title.journalpl
Studia Historyczne
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
1
Views per month
Views per city
Wijewo
1
Downloads
polit_spor_o_czang_kaj-szeka_w_historiografii_angielskojezycznej_2011.pdf
94
polit_spor_o_czang_kaj-szeka_w_historiografii_angielskojezycznej_2011.odt
7