Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses : a meta-analysis
conspiracy beliefs
COVID-19 prevention
meta-analysis
This review comes from a themed issue on Conspiracy Theories; edited by Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Roland Imhoff
While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health.
cris.lastimport.wos | 2024-04-10T01:24:16Z | |
dc.abstract.en | While conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are proliferating, their impact on health-related responses during the present pandemic is not yet fully understood. We meta-analyzed correlational and longitudinal evidence from 53 studies (N = 78,625) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Conspiracy beliefs were weakly associated with more reluctance toward prevention measures both cross-sectionally and over time. They explained lower vaccination and social distancing responses but were unrelated to mask wearing and hygiene responses. Conspiracy beliefs showed an increasing association with prevention responses as the pandemic progressed and explained support for alternative treatments lacking scientific bases (e.g., chloroquine treatment, complementary medicine). Despite small and heterogenous effects, at a large scale, conspiracy beliefs are a non-negligible threat to public health. | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Bierwiaczonek, Kinga | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Gundersen, Aleksander B. | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Kunst, Jonas R. | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-12T15:19:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-12T15:19:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.additional | This review comes from a themed issue on Conspiracy Theories; edited by Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Roland Imhoff | pl |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 46 | pl |
dc.identifier.articleid | 101346 | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101346 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2352-2518 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 2352-250X | pl |
dc.identifier.project | 2019/35/J/HS6/03498 | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/291937 | |
dc.language | eng | pl |
dc.language.container | eng | pl |
dc.rights | Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa | * |
dc.rights.licence | CC-BY | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl | * |
dc.share.type | inne | |
dc.subject.en | conspiracy beliefs | pl |
dc.subject.en | COVID-19 prevention | pl |
dc.subject.en | meta-analysis | pl |
dc.subtype | ReviewArticle | pl |
dc.title | The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses : a meta-analysis | pl |
dc.title.journal | Current Opinion in Psychology | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
43
Views per month
Views per city
Downloads
Open Access