Nieważność czynności prawnej jako wynik nadużycia pozycji dominującej

2012
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enCompetition law often provides that any legal acts, including contracts, resulting from infringements of competition law should be considered null and void. This sanction is therefore a sanction of civil law and it raises a few interesting questions. It is much easier to accept that a contract containing clauses forbidden by the competition law, such as price-fixing, is null and void (in whole or in part), but the problem is much more complex when the abuse of dominant position is the reason of nullity. Contracts forced upon other undertakings by a dominant undertaking usually do not contain clauses that as such would violate the law, and declaring them null and void could lead to many undesirable consequences. The article argues that in such cases one has to establish whether the abuse is reflected in the provisions of the contract itself. This could be generally assumed if the abuse is directed at the other party and in such a way that in order to determine abuse it is not necessary to take into account other behavior of the dominant undertaking or market circumstances. Hence, manifestly unfair contract terms (such as excessive prices, unjust terms and conditions of payments, etc.) could fall into this category, whereas such forms of abuse as discrimination, predatory pricing or loyalty rebates should not entail nullity.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracji : Zakład Prawa Informacyjnegopl
dc.contributor.authorTargosz, Tomasz - 132370 pl
dc.date.accession2018-12-11pl
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T10:27:36Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T10:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2012pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. w przypisach. Streszcz. w jęz. ang. s. 98-99.pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.physical77-99pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/shpj-1s80pl
dc.identifier.issn1641-1609pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/63296
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://biedronne.home.pl/transformacje/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/tpp_2-2012_targosz.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleNieważność czynności prawnej jako wynik nadużycia pozycji dominującejpl
dc.title.alternativeNullity of legal acts as a result of abuse of dominant positionpl
dc.title.journalTransformacje Prawa Prywatnegopl
dc.title.volumeZeszyt jubileuszowy dla pani profesor Janiny Preussner-Zamorskiejpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Competition law often provides that any legal acts, including contracts, resulting from infringements of competition law should be considered null and void. This sanction is therefore a sanction of civil law and it raises a few interesting questions. It is much easier to accept that a contract containing clauses forbidden by the competition law, such as price-fixing, is null and void (in whole or in part), but the problem is much more complex when the abuse of dominant position is the reason of nullity. Contracts forced upon other undertakings by a dominant undertaking usually do not contain clauses that as such would violate the law, and declaring them null and void could lead to many undesirable consequences. The article argues that in such cases one has to establish whether the abuse is reflected in the provisions of the contract itself. This could be generally assumed if the abuse is directed at the other party and in such a way that in order to determine abuse it is not necessary to take into account other behavior of the dominant undertaking or market circumstances. Hence, manifestly unfair contract terms (such as excessive prices, unjust terms and conditions of payments, etc.) could fall into this category, whereas such forms of abuse as discrimination, predatory pricing or loyalty rebates should not entail nullity.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Zakład Prawa Informacyjnego
dc.contributor.authorpl
Targosz, Tomasz - 132370
dc.date.accessionpl
2018-12-11
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-11T10:27:36Z
dc.date.available
2018-12-11T10:27:36Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2012
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. w przypisach. Streszcz. w jęz. ang. s. 98-99.
dc.description.numberpl
2
dc.description.physicalpl
77-99
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/shpj-1s80
dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/63296
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://biedronne.home.pl/transformacje/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/tpp_2-2012_targosz.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Nieważność czynności prawnej jako wynik nadużycia pozycji dominującej
dc.title.alternativepl
Nullity of legal acts as a result of abuse of dominant position
dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
dc.title.volumepl
Zeszyt jubileuszowy dla pani profesor Janiny Preussner-Zamorskiej
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
4
Views per month
Views per city
San Jose
2
Ashburn
1
Lublin
1
Downloads
targosz_niewaznosc_czynnosci_prawnej_jako_wynik_naduzycia_2012.odt
23
targosz_niewaznosc_czynnosci_prawnej_jako_wynik_naduzycia_2012.pdf
21