Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Rozważania nad wyzyskiem (art. 388 k.c.) z perspektywy prawa i orzecznictwa austriackiego
Considerations of exploitation (Art. 388 of the Polish Civil Code) from the perspective of austrian law and jurisprudence
wyzysk
wzruszalność umowy
nieważność umowy
exploitation
voidability of a contract
nullity of a contract
Bibliogr. s. 50-52
The private law protection of interests of an aggrieved party under Article 388 of the Polish Civil Code (exploitation) is not without vulnerabilities. The main problem is the burden of proof (Article 6 of the Polish Civil Code). The same applies to protection under criminal law (Article 286 § 1 of the Polish Penal Code - fraud), which can be harsh for all potential and/or actual injured parties. Therefore, it is worth to examine the Polish institution of exploitation, including the recent changes in this provision, from the perspective of Austrian law and jurisprudence and, if necessary, to construct de lege ferenda proposals for the Polish legislator.
dc.abstract.en | The private law protection of interests of an aggrieved party under Article 388 of the Polish Civil Code (exploitation) is not without vulnerabilities. The main problem is the burden of proof (Article 6 of the Polish Civil Code). The same applies to protection under criminal law (Article 286 § 1 of the Polish Penal Code - fraud), which can be harsh for all potential and/or actual injured parties. Therefore, it is worth to examine the Polish institution of exploitation, including the recent changes in this provision, from the perspective of Austrian law and jurisprudence and, if necessary, to construct de lege ferenda proposals for the Polish legislator. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kosmol, Mateusz | |
dc.date.accession | 2024-12-16 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-16T10:35:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-16T10:35:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.additional | Bibliogr. s. 50-52 | |
dc.description.number | 3 | |
dc.description.physical | 31-53 | |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.26106/q5gr-fk87 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1641-1609 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1641-1609 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/handle/item/505387 | |
dc.identifier.weblink | https://journals.law.uj.edu.pl/TPP/article/view/1256 | |
dc.language | pol | |
dc.language.container | pol | |
dc.rights | Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa | |
dc.rights.licence | CC-BY | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl | |
dc.share.type | otwarte czasopismo | |
dc.subject.en | exploitation | |
dc.subject.en | voidability of a contract | |
dc.subject.en | nullity of a contract | |
dc.subject.pl | wyzysk | |
dc.subject.pl | wzruszalność umowy | |
dc.subject.pl | nieważność umowy | |
dc.subtype | Article | |
dc.title | Rozważania nad wyzyskiem (art. 388 k.c.) z perspektywy prawa i orzecznictwa austriackiego | |
dc.title.alternative | Considerations of exploitation (Art. 388 of the Polish Civil Code) from the perspective of austrian law and jurisprudence | |
dc.title.journal | Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego | |
dc.type | JournalArticle | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | en |