In my article I consider deconstruction as a philosophical strategy. The problems which arise with the explication of what deconstruction might be result from the fact that deconstruction escapes full conceptualization and does not allow itself to be presented as a philosophical method. Such resistance does not mean that we cannot recognize manifestations of deconstruction in the body of a text whose structural incoherence will not allow us to recover one rightful meaning, since every text is constantly in deconstruction, opening itself to innumerable interpretations. Therefore, deconstruction is something that one cannot control, but at the same time it makes every textual operation possible.