Jagiellonian University Repository

"In principio erat sermo" : Erazma z Rotterdamu rozważania nad znaczeniem pojęcia "logos" w pierwszym wersecie prologu Ewangelii św. Jana

Communities & Collections

pcg.skipToMenu

"In principio erat sermo" : Erazma z Rotterdamu rozważania nad znaczeniem pojęcia "logos" w pierwszym wersecie prologu Ewangelii św. Jana

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Koryl, Jakub [SAP13036857] pl
dc.contributor.editor Choptiany, Michał [USOS26820] pl
dc.contributor.editor Ryczek, Wojciech [SAP13905138] pl
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-16T11:13:07Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-16T11:13:07Z
dc.date.issued 2011 pl
dc.identifier.isbn 978-83-7638-065-0 pl
dc.identifier.isbn 978-83-7638-098-8 pl
dc.identifier.uri https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/79206
dc.language pol pl
dc.rights Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl/legalcode *
dc.title "In principio erat sermo" : Erazma z Rotterdamu rozważania nad znaczeniem pojęcia "logos" w pierwszym wersecie prologu Ewangelii św. Jana pl
dc.title.alternative "In principio erat sermo" : Erasmus of Rotterdam delibarations of the meaning pf "Logos" in the first verse of the prologue of the Gospel of John pl
dc.type BookSection pl
dc.pubinfo Kraków : Księgarnia Akademicka pl
dc.description.physical 93-130 pl
dc.description.additional Streszcz. po ang., bibliogr. pl
dc.abstract.en The aim of this article is twofold. First of all, it is an attempt to introduce forgotten and rather overlooked text in Erasmian studies, namely Erasmus’ Apologia de loco "In principio erat sermo". Written and published in 1520, Apologia was a detailed answer to a controversy which aroused around Erasmus’ latin rendering of the first verse of Joannine Prologue. His arguments for rendering λόγος as sermo can be summarized on the basis of criteria of grammatical correctness and suitable style according to the rules of ancient rhetoric. These reasons based on the grammar and style obviously did not fulfill Erasmus’ commentary as he also paid attention to the universal nature of language (both divine and human), namely the relation between the word conceived in mind and uttered in language (λόγος ένδιάθετος - λόγος προφορικός). As such it is the second issue here discussed. Following Augustine’s and Hilary’s treatises on Holy Trinity, Erasmus not only took over their terminology as well as taxonomy, but he also focused on the inalienable limits of human language in expressing and describing mysteries of faith. What is also noticeable, Erasmus was keen to use scholastic terminology (introduced by Boethius and developed by Aquinas) in his strife with interpretation of the Prologue. His theological polemic with Edward Lee shows that he understood well the Trinitarian taxonomy used in the Middle Ages, especially the question of the use of the article and anarthrous constructions of Greek syntax. The abundance of quotations from Erasmus’ and his predecessors’ works and commentaries illustrates syncretic on fact sources and nature of Trinitarian discourse in the threshold of modern times. This large corpus of associations, beginning with Origen, along with terminological provisions made by First Council of Nicaea, Church Fathers of forth and fifth century and finally metaphysical language of scholastic theology, features Erasmus’ work as an important and still not appreciated stage in the whole process of shaping theological terminology in Latin language. The very meaning of the key notions remained rather unaltered but the method of using them was distinctively modified. Clarity of language used in the theological controversies and sticking to the scope of orthodoxy was the major purpose of such strategy. After all, this paper may serve as an introduction to further studies concerning the foundations and origins of philosophical hermeneutics (in Gadamer's term) which are, as I have tried to give some of the convincing evidences, inherent in Erasmus’ thoughts on language. pl
dc.subject.pl logos pl
dc.subject.pl Erazm z Rotterdamu pl
dc.subject.pl Ewangelia św. Jana pl
dc.subject.en logos pl
dc.subject.en Erasmus of Rotterdam pl
dc.subject.en Gospel of John pl
dc.subject.en Desiderius Erasmus pl
dc.subject.en Bible pl
dc.subject.en sermo pl
dc.subject.en verbum pl
dc.subject.en biblical hermeneutics pl
dc.subject.en mutable-universal character of language pl
dc.subject.en biblical syntax pl
dc.subject.en translation pl
dc.subject.en trinitology pl
dc.subject.en theological discourse pl
dc.description.publication 3,2 pl
dc.title.container Studia rhetorica pl
dc.language.container pol pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Polonistyki : Katedra Historii Literatury Staropolskiej pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original CC BY-NC-ND; otwarte repozytorium; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; po opublikowaniu;108 pl
dc.identifier.project ROD UJ / OS pl


Files in this item

Name: koryl_in_principi ...
Size: 2.398Mb
Format: PDF
View/Open
Icon
Name: koryl_in_principi ...
Size: 110.8Kb
Format: OpenOffice Writer
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa