Jagiellonian University Repository

Detecting deception : does the cognitive interview impair discrimination with CBCA criteria in elderly witnesses?

Detecting deception : does the cognitive interview ...

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Dukała, Karolina [SAP14005255] pl
dc.contributor.author Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig pl
dc.contributor.author Polczyk, Romuald [SAP11016148] pl
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-13T08:56:19Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-13T08:56:19Z
dc.date.issued 2019 pl
dc.identifier.issn 1068-316X pl
dc.identifier.uri https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/74465
dc.language eng pl
dc.rights Dodaję tylko opis bibliograficzny *
dc.rights.uri *
dc.title Detecting deception : does the cognitive interview impair discrimination with CBCA criteria in elderly witnesses? pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 195-217 pl
dc.abstract.en The accuracy of an eyewitness statement depends on the interviewing method used. Therefore, empirically tested interviewing techniques have been developed, in particular for vulnerable witnesses. Sometimes witnesses may not tell the truth based on personally experienced events but give testimony about events they have only heard about, thus lying about the event. In this experiment, 80 witnesses over 60 years old either saw a film or heard an audiotaped summary. They were interviewed either with a standard interview (SI) or an Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI). The ECI led to an increase in the amount of information gained without jeopardizing its accuracy compared to the SI. Trained coders evaluated transcripts of the interviews with Criteria-Based Content Analysis and judged the truthfulness of each account. Some differences in CBCA criteria were in the expected direction, others opposite to expectation, thus prohibiting the use of a summary score. Accounts from the SI group (80%) were judged correctly significantly more often than accounts from the ECI group (40%). Only 15% of the lies in the ECI group were judged correctly vs. 80% in the SI group. Findings are discussed regarding the importance of testing interview techniques with respect to their potential to detect deception. pl
dc.subject.en CBCA criteria, pl
dc.subject.en cognitive interview pl
dc.subject.en detection of deception pl
dc.subject.en elderly pl
dc.subject.en interview techniques pl
dc.subject.en interview techniques pl
dc.description.volume 25 pl
dc.description.number 2 pl
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1511789 pl
dc.identifier.eissn 1477-2744 pl
dc.title.journal Psychology, Crime & Law pl
dc.language.container eng pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Psychologii pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original bez licencji pl
dc.identifier.project ROD UJ / O pl
.pointsMNiSW [2019 A]: 100

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)