The Ptolemies versus the Achaean and Aetolian Leagues in the 250s-220s BC

doi:10.4467/20843909EL.12.004.0745

The Ptolemies versus the Achaean and Aetolian Leagues in the 250s-220s BC

Communities & Collections

pcg.skipToMenu

The Ptolemies versus the Achaean and Aetolian Leagues in the 250s-220s BC

View Usage Statistics

Bibliographic description

punktacja MNiSW [2012 B]: 4

title:	The Ptolemies versus the Achaean and Aetolian Leagues in the 250s-220s BC
author:	Grabowski Tomasz
journal title:	Electrum
title of volume:	The Greek world in the 4th and 3rd centuries BC
volume:	19
date of publication :	2012
pages:	83-97
ISSN:	1897-3426
eISSN:	2084-3909
ISBN:	978-83-233-3483-5
DOI:	10.4467/20843909EL.12.004.0745
language:	English
journal language:	English
abstract in English:	In the 250s and 240s continental Greece found itself in a particularly complicated situation. The growth of the Aetolian and Achaean Leagues, as well as Sparta’s awoken ambitions, presented the Ptolemies with favorable conditions to actively pursue efforts to weaken the Macedonian infl uence there. Initially, the partner of the Ptolemies became the Achaean League. In this way, the Ptolemaic fl eet gained important footholds, including both Corinthian ports, Kenchreai in the Saronic Gulf and Lechaion in the Corinthian Gulf. This strengthened the position of the Lagids at sea, and it was the islands on the Aegean Sea and the coasts of Asia Minor that were in the centre of the Ptolemies’ interest. However, the Aetolian League could continue to be seen as one of their possible partners in Greek politics. We should not exaggerate the Achaean-Aetolian confl ict. After the death of Antigonus Gonatas in 239, the two confl icted federations were joined by an alliance. It cannot be excluded that Sparta also cooperated with the coalition, and the king of Egypt could have been a convenient link in this cooperation. There is no information whatsoever to suggest an Egyptian initiative to form the coalition. After the defeat of the Egyptian fl eet at Andros in ca. 245, the position of the Lagids in the Aegean Sea was not as strong as it had once been. This was all the more reason for Ptolemies to closely observe the Aetolians’ intense activity on the Aegean Sea. The Ptolemies and Aetolians concluded symmachia. Ultimately, however, alliances were reversed: Aratus pushed the Achaean League towards a coalition with Macedonia, but earlier, having learned about the Achaean-Macedonian negotiations, Ptolemy decided to cancel his fi nancial support for the Achaeans and hand it over to Sparta. It is very likely that the situation in the whole Aegean region (especially the expedition of Antigonus Doson to Caria in 227) played a role in changing the Ptolemies’ policy. The contacts which the Aetolian League established in the region were all the more reason for Ptolemy III to choose Cleomenes and the Aetolians at the expense of the Achaean League. At that time, the beginning of closer relations between the Aetolians and the Attalids could also be observed. It cannot be ruled out that the Ptolemaic diplomacy was a mediator, since up until then the Aetolians had no common interests with Pergamum. For the Lagids, on the other hand, the Attalids were a force worth supporting against the Seleucids, just as the Aetolians were a valuable partner in the rivalry against Macedonia
keywords in English:	Aetolian League, Achaean League, Sparta, Athens, the Ptolemies
affiliation:	Wydział Historyczny
type:	journal article
subtype:	academic paper