Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Z dziejów sądownictwa opata koprzywnickiego od XIV do XVI wieku
The full development of the immunity concessions as made in favour of the estates belonging to the monastery of Koprzywnica coincided with the process of founding towns and villages according to the German law pattern. By virtue of the privilegies granted to the monastic estates in the years 1268. 1277 and 1308, and particularly by virtue of the privilege of 1360, it was specified that the peasants and the townsmen inhabitting the monastic estates were subject to the Courts of law as organized by sołtys and wójt (both being the heads of villages, the sołtys being below the wójt). The wójts and soltyses, in their turn, were subject to the Monastery Court, but in cause reservate cases to the Royal Court. As regards the appellate procedure, the appeals from the monastis estates were heard by the Abbot’s Court and by the Higher Court of German law. The Abbot’s Court was composed of the Abbot himself who presided it, as well as of the monastic brothers who were called rectores or procurators and who adjudicated also on official trips to the respective localities. As a result there came to being the local Courts such as that in Frysztak (which was of standing character) and those in Polomia, Okonina and Bystrzyca (which were of ad hoc nature). The Royal Higher Courts of German Law, like those in Sandomierz, Biecz and Kraków, considerably competed with the monastic Courts. During the period in which soltyships were being bought up by the Monastery (which, as regards the Sandomierz province, happened in the second part of the 14th century, in the Biecz and Pilzno estate, in the mid-15th century, while in the Lublin estates: on the turn of the 16lh century) the jurisdication was excercised by the Abbot himself or by his officers who were called procurators, factors or ekonoms.
dc.abstract.en | The full development of the immunity concessions as made in favour of the estates belonging to the monastery of Koprzywnica coincided with the process of founding towns and villages according to the German law pattern. By virtue of the privilegies granted to the monastic estates in the years 1268. 1277 and 1308, and particularly by virtue of the privilege of 1360, it was specified that the peasants and the townsmen inhabitting the monastic estates were subject to the Courts of law as organized by sołtys and wójt (both being the heads of villages, the sołtys being below the wójt). The wójts and soltyses, in their turn, were subject to the Monastery Court, but in cause reservate cases to the Royal Court. As regards the appellate procedure, the appeals from the monastis estates were heard by the Abbot’s Court and by the Higher Court of German law. The Abbot’s Court was composed of the Abbot himself who presided it, as well as of the monastic brothers who were called rectores or procurators and who adjudicated also on official trips to the respective localities. As a result there came to being the local Courts such as that in Frysztak (which was of standing character) and those in Polomia, Okonina and Bystrzyca (which were of ad hoc nature). The Royal Higher Courts of German Law, like those in Sandomierz, Biecz and Kraków, considerably competed with the monastic Courts. During the period in which soltyships were being bought up by the Monastery (which, as regards the Sandomierz province, happened in the second part of the 14th century, in the Biecz and Pilzno estate, in the mid-15th century, while in the Lublin estates: on the turn of the 16lh century) the jurisdication was excercised by the Abbot himself or by his officers who were called procurators, factors or ekonoms. | pl |
dc.affiliation | Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Zakład Prawa Kościelnego i Wyznaniowego | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Zarzycki, Zdzisław - 132869 | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-22T14:42:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-22T14:42:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 192 | |
dc.description.accesstime | po opublikowaniu | |
dc.description.additional | Bibliogr. w przypisach. Streszcz. w jęz. ang. s. 59. Strona wydawcy: https://www.wuj.pl | pl |
dc.description.physical | 43-59 | pl |
dc.description.publication | 1,0 | pl |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 1 (2004) | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2084-4131 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 2084-4115 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / OS | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/69086 | |
dc.language | pol | pl |
dc.language.container | pol | pl |
dc.participation | Zarzycki, Zdzisław: 100%; | pl |
dc.rights | Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych | * |
dc.rights.licence | OTHER | |
dc.rights.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf | * |
dc.share.type | otwarte repozytorium | |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | Z dziejów sądownictwa opata koprzywnickiego od XIV do XVI wieku | pl |
dc.title.alternative | Some remarks on the history of judicial activities of the Abbot of Koprzywnica 14th through 16th centuries | pl |
dc.title.journal | Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
0
Views per month
Downloads
Open Access