Jagiellonian University Repository

Prawo do autorstwa i współautorstwa : (uwagi na tle orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 25 maja 2011 r., II CSK 527/10)


Prawo do autorstwa i współautorstwa : (uwagi na tle orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 25 maja 2011 r., II CSK 527/10)

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Stanisławska-Kloc, Sybilla [SAP11016101] pl
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-12T08:47:59Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-12T08:47:59Z
dc.date.issued 2012 pl
dc.identifier.issn 1641-1609 pl
dc.identifier.uri https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/63503
dc.language pol pl
dc.rights Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych *
dc.rights.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf *
dc.title Prawo do autorstwa i współautorstwa : (uwagi na tle orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 25 maja 2011 r., II CSK 527/10) pl
dc.title.alternative Right to authorship and co-authorship : (remarks to the judgment of the Supreme Court from 25 May 2011, case docket III CSK 527/10) pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 39-58 pl
dc.description.additional Bibliogr. w przypisach. Streszcz. w jęz. ang. s. 58. pl
dc.identifier.weblink http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/tpp_2-2012_stanislawska-kloc.pdf pl
dc.abstract.en The author addresses the problem of authorship and co-authorship in the context of the decision of the Supreme Court from 25 May 2011 (II CSK 527/10) concerning the copyright, but with some implications for scientific publications in general. The court's decision in question is important for the co-authorship and was rendered with regard to a medical publication of a rather popular character. The Supreme Court stated inter alia that a "verification of a scientific work consisting in removing scientifically questionable fragments amounts to co-authorship". One may express serious doubts whether the judgment is correct and could foster adequate interpretation of law and the establishing of good academic practice. Although co-authorship in the field of science is a controversial issue, which is notoriously difficult to regulate properly by law, and although custom and fairness very often play the prominent role, the analyzed judgment must be treated with caution. This is because taking into consideration both the facts of the case, as well as the result by which persons verifying a given text and making editorial changes (e.g. deleting some fragments) could be regarded as co-authors. The article argues that such an approach to a creative contribution cannot be approved. Nevertheless, the problem of proper designation of a "scientific contributions" (not being copyright works as such, but eligible for protection under Articles 23 and 24 of the Civil Code as a "scientific creations") deserves some effort. pl
dc.description.number 2 pl
dc.identifier.doi 10.26106/9y1f-ty82 pl
dc.title.journal Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego pl
dc.title.volume Zeszyt jubileuszowy dla pani profesor Janiny Preussner-Zamorskiej pl
dc.language.container pol pl
dc.date.accession 2018-12-12 pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Zakład Prawa Autorskiego pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original OTHER; otwarte czasopismo; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0 pl
dc.identifier.project ROD UJ / OP pl
.pointsMNiSW [2012 B]: 5

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych