Jagiellonian University Repository

Angielska doktryna promissory estoppel a polska klauzula nadużycia prawa


Angielska doktryna promissory estoppel a polska klauzula nadużycia prawa

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Halberda, Jan [SAP11019685] pl
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-14T10:13:14Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-14T10:13:14Z
dc.date.created 2014 pl
dc.date.issued 2014 pl
dc.identifier.isbn 978-83-233-3869-7 pl
dc.identifier.issn 2084-4115 pl
dc.identifier.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/4959
dc.language pol pl
dc.rights Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych *
dc.rights.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf *
dc.title Angielska doktryna promissory estoppel a polska klauzula nadużycia prawa pl
dc.title.alternative The English doctrine of promissory estoppel and the Polish clause of abuse of law pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 395-404 pl
dc.description.additional Błędne DOI - DOI przypisane do artykułu wskazuje publikację innego autora. pl
dc.identifier.weblink http://www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa/2014/Tom-7-Zeszyt-2-2014/art/3736/ pl
dc.abstract.en The English Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and the Polish Concept of the Abuse-of-Right Clause The article discusses the issues of evolution and premises of the applying of English concept known as promissory estoppel. In the present paper the development of the legal doctrine referring to the aforementioned problems is illustrated with the examples of several leading cases such as that of High Trees (1947) and Combe v. Combe (1951). In these cases it was lord Denning who was a decision maker. The author of the paper analyzes the general principles on which the promissory estoppel might be invoked. He draws our attention to the fact that in the course of litigation it is necessary to prove the existence of a promise on the basis of which a promisee (the person who was promised something), while reasonably relying on this promise decided to do something or to refrain from doing it, and simultaneously it would be inequitable if a promisor (the person making a promise) could call off what he had promised. The author of the paper made an effort to answer a question whether the abuse-of-right clause provided for in Art.5 of the Civil Code may be regarded as the Polish equivalent of promissory estoppel. pl
dc.subject.pl prawo cywilne pl
dc.subject.pl prawo zobowiązań pl
dc.subject.pl historia prawa pl
dc.subject.pl promissory estoppel pl
dc.subject.pl klauzula nadużycia prawa pl
dc.subject.en civil law pl
dc.subject.en law of obligations pl
dc.subject.en legal history pl
dc.subject.en promissory esoppel pl
dc.subject.en abuse of right clause pl
dc.description.volume 7 (2014) pl
dc.description.number 2 pl
dc.description.points 8 pl
dc.description.publication 0,7 pl
dc.identifier.doi 10.4467/20844131KS.14.028.2269 pl
dc.identifier.eissn 2084-4131 pl
dc.title.journal Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa pl
dc.language.container pol pl
dc.date.accession 2017-11-28 pl
dc.participation Halberda, Jan: 100%; pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Powszechnej Historii Państwa i Prawa pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original OTHER; otwarte czasopismo; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0 pl
dc.identifier.project ROD UJ / P pl
.pointsMNiSW [2014 B]: 8

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych