Jagiellonian University Repository

How non-experts fail where experts do not : implications of expertise for resistance to cognitive rigidity

Communities & Collections

pcg.skipToMenu

How non-experts fail where experts do not : implications of expertise for resistance to cognitive rigidity

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Nęcka, Edward [SAP11009163] pl
dc.contributor.author Kubik, Tomasz pl
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-19T17:39:22Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-19T17:39:22Z
dc.date.issued 2012 pl
dc.identifier.issn 0039-3320 pl
dc.identifier.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/3221
dc.language eng pl
dc.title How non-experts fail where experts do not : implications of expertise for resistance to cognitive rigidity pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 3-14 pl
dc.identifier.weblink http://www.studiapsychologica.com/index.php/view-articles/ pl
dc.abstract.en Experts’ resistance to cognitive rigidity is discussed with reference to two aspects of the phenomenon of mental inflexibility: inter-domain rigidity and intra-domain rigidity. Although there are reasons to expect increased rigidity of experts outside the domain of their expertise, we hypothesized that they would be less prone to mental set within their domain of specialization. In two experiments (N = 72, N = 82), Experts, Intermediates and Novices solved tasks fostering mental set. Their goal was to solve a series of tasks of the same kind and then work on a task that was similar to the previous ones at the superficial level, while being substantially changed at the deep level of analysis. As a result, the effect of mental set (Einstellung) was expected to appear. The experiments were conducted in two different domains: management (Experiment 1) and English grammar (Experiment 2). Experts proved more resistant to intra-domain rigidity in both domains. In addition, they were faster and more accurate, thus replicating classic effects of expertise. The results regarding the role of anxiety in resistance to rigidity were unclear. The results suggest that, with reference to rigidity of experts, it is justifiable to distinguish between inter-domain and intra-domain rigidity. Experts, as compared to non-experts, should be regarded as more resistant to the phenomenon of intra-domain rigidity. pl
dc.subject.en expertise pl
dc.subject.en rigidity pl
dc.subject.en cognitive rigidity pl
dc.subject.en expert pl
dc.description.volume 54 pl
dc.description.number 1 pl
dc.title.journal Studia Psychologica pl
dc.language.container eng pl
dc.date.accession 2018-02-12 pl
dc.participation Nęcka, Edward: 40%; pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Psychologii pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original OTHER; inne; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0; pl
.pointsMNiSW [2012 A]: 15


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)