Jagiellonian University Repository

Paternalistic regulations expressed through means of visual communication of law? : contribution to another distinction of paternalistic legal regulations

Paternalistic regulations expressed through means ...

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Dudek, Michał [SAP14006177] pl
dc.contributor.editor Araszkiewicz, Michał [SAP13016594] pl
dc.contributor.editor Myška, Matěj pl
dc.contributor.editor Smejkalová, Terezie pl
dc.contributor.editor Šavelka, Jaromír pl
dc.contributor.editor Škop, Martin pl
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-12T09:05:48Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-12T09:05:48Z
dc.date.issued 2011 pl
dc.identifier.isbn 978-80-210-5579-7 pl
dc.identifier.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/3043
dc.language eng pl
dc.rights Dodaję tylko opis bibliograficzny *
dc.rights.uri *
dc.title Paternalistic regulations expressed through means of visual communication of law? : contribution to another distinction of paternalistic legal regulations pl
dc.type BookSection pl
dc.pubinfo Brno : Masaryk University pl
dc.description.physical 167-179 pl
dc.identifier.weblink https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/argumentation2011/argumentation2011.pdf pl
dc.abstract.en The aim of this article is to outline the issue of paternalistic legal regulations being expressed through means of visual communication of law, such as often used in legal realm “optical signs, which are not expressions of ethnic written language”, that is, through traffic signs. Main focus is placed on one particular prohibitory traffic sign, “no entry” sign, which often is placed at the exit ends of one-way streets to determine traffic direction. On the one hand, this analysis can be treated as a specific attempt to supplement the debate on legal paternalism. Namely, it stresses the issue of characteristic features of danger, risk of harm justifying given legal regulation, which restricts its addressees’ liberty, whether to “protect (...) from self-inflicted harm or (...) to guide them (...) toward their own good”. It is proposed to distinguish two kinds of danger underlying paternalistic regulations: so-called “natural” danger and so-called “conventionally-made” danger. Apart from this, the problem of visual communication through traffic signs is outlined. pl
dc.subject.en visual communication of law pl
dc.subject.en traffic signs pl
dc.subject.en legal paternalism pl
dc.description.points 5 pl
dc.description.publication 0,67 pl
dc.description.conftype international pl
dc.title.container Argumentation 2011 : International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law : conference proceedings pl
dc.language.container eng pl
dc.date.accession 2015-02-12 pl
dc.affiliation Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Socjologii Prawa pl
dc.subtype ConferenceProceedings pl
dc.conference Argumentation 2011 : International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law; 2011-10-07; 2011-10-07; Brno; Czechy; indeksowana w Web of Science; ; Google scholar; pl


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)