Jagiellonian University Repository

Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-172/18 AMS Neve

pcg.skipToMenu

Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-172/18 AMS Neve

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Świerczyński, Marek pl
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-17T15:53:36Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-17T15:53:36Z
dc.date.issued 2020 pl
dc.identifier.issn 1641-1609 pl
dc.identifier.uri https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/154065
dc.language pol pl
dc.rights Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych *
dc.rights.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf *
dc.title Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-172/18 AMS Neve pl
dc.title.alternative Commentary to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-172/18 AMS Neve pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 157-167 pl
dc.description.additional Bibliogr. s. 165-166 pl
dc.identifier.weblink http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Świerczyński.pdf pl
dc.abstract.en The AMS Neve judgment presents an important step forward in the classification of the connecting factor of the place of infringement under the EU Trade Mark Regulation. The judgement concerns Article 97 of Regulation 207/2009, which is no longer in force, but is fully in line with the current Article 125 of Regulation 2017/1001. The EU High Court rightly pointed out that the court having jurisdiction over the place where the harmful event occurred is best positioned to decide on the case. This is justified by the proximity to the subject matter of the dispute and the ease of taking evidence. The EU High Court adopted a liberal position. In this judgment, it allowed for a broad access to the courts by the IP right holders. This interpretation appears to stem from the need to increase protection of IP rights in cases of their online infringements. The EU Trade Mark Regulation provides additional arguments for this liberal interpretation. A modification of the existing approach consists in adapting the jurisdictional rules to contemporary, modern forms of exploitation of intangible assets on the Internet. The EU High Court pointed out that adopting a narrow (restrictive) interpretation of the jurisdictional rules would lead to an increased risk that the infringers would operate in the territory of a given country in order to avoid the jurisdiction of the courts. This would mean that the special jurisdiction rules would lose their alternative nature compared to the general jurisdiction rules. pl
dc.subject.pl jurysdykcja krajowa pl
dc.subject.pl własność intelektualna pl
dc.subject.pl naruszenia internetowe pl
dc.subject.en international jurisdiction pl
dc.subject.en intellectual property pl
dc.subject.en internet infringements pl
dc.description.number 1 pl
dc.identifier.doi 10.26106/amkp-fw04 pl
dc.title.journal Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego pl
dc.language.container pol pl
dc.date.accession 2020-04-17 pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original OTHER; otwarte czasopismo; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0 pl


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych