Jagiellonian University Repository

Pojęcie manipulacji instrumentem finansowym : część II


Pojęcie manipulacji instrumentem finansowym : część II

Show full item record

dc.contributor.author Korn, Kamil pl
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-08T16:06:17Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-08T16:06:17Z
dc.date.issued 2012 pl
dc.identifier.issn 1641-1609 pl
dc.identifier.uri https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/153516
dc.language pol pl
dc.rights Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych *
dc.rights.uri http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf *
dc.title Pojęcie manipulacji instrumentem finansowym : część II pl
dc.title.alternative The notion of manipulation in a financial instrument : part II pl
dc.type JournalArticle pl
dc.description.physical 31-66 pl
dc.identifier.weblink http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/tpp_4-2012_korn.pdf pl
dc.abstract.en The first part of the paper discussed the market manipulation as an economic phenomenon regulated by law. The second part consists in the analysis of Article 39(2) of the Polish Act on Trading in Financial Instruments that provides for a definition of a market manipulation relating to financial instruments. This regulation is a complicated one and contains several unclear terms. Proposals are being made as to how this provision should be constructed together with examples of behaviors that fall into different types of prohibited manipulation. The analysis shows that certain legal definitions of various types of manipulation overlap. Furthermore, some of the definitions can only be understood by referring to the concepts of other types of manipulation (e.g. misleading about the price [Article 39(2)(5)] can be properly interpreted only by referring to definitions of other types of manipulation in Article 39(2)). Although the provision of Article 39 does not accurately express it, such approach appears to be the only acceptable method of interpretation. Those ambiguities result mainly from the way of implementation of the Market Abuse Directive by the Polish legislator. Some types of manipulation included in the Directive only as examples of behaviors falling under the general definition of manipulation are regulated in the Polish law as separate types of manipulation. This is an example of a bad legislative technique. The notion of artificial price provides for another source of controversies (Article 39(2)(2)). At first, it seems to be an objective element of the definition. However, a closer analysis reveals that artificial price should be defined by means of subjective element - the manipulative intent of the trader. Taken as a whole, the definition of manipulation relating to financial instrument contained in Article 39(2) of the Polish Act on Trading in Financial Instruments must be evaluated as inaccurate regulation that result in legal uncertainty. pl
dc.description.number 4 pl
dc.identifier.doi 10.26106/1crx-k579 pl
dc.title.journal Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego pl
dc.language.container pol pl
dc.date.accession 2020-04-08 pl
dc.subtype Article pl
dc.rights.original OTHER; otwarte czasopismo; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0 pl
dc.identifier.project ROD UJ / OP pl

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych