The thin red line (TRL) is a theory about the semantics of future-contingents. The central idea is that there is such a thing as the ‘actual future’, even in the presence of indeterminism. It is inspired by a famous solution to the problem of divine foreknowledge associated with William of Ockham, in which the freedom of agents is argued to be compatible with God’s omniscience. In the modern branching time setting, the theory of the TRL is widely regarded to suffer from several fundamental problems. In this paper we propose several new TRL semantics, each with differing
degrees of success. This leads up to our final semantics, which is a cross between the TRL and supervaluationism. We discuss the notions of truth, validity and semantic consequence which result from our final semantics, and demonstrate some of its pleasing results. This account, we believe, answers themain objection in the literature, and thus places the TRL on the same level as any other competing semantics for future contingents.
pl
dc.subject.en
future contingents
pl
dc.subject.en
branching-time
pl
dc.subject.en
Ockhamism
pl
dc.subject.en
thin red line
pl
dc.subject.en
supervaluationism
pl
dc.description.volume
188
pl
dc.description.number
1
pl
dc.identifier.doi
10.1007/s11229-012-0064-4
pl
dc.identifier.eissn
1573-0964
pl
dc.title.journal
Synthese
pl
dc.language.container
eng
pl
dc.date.accession
2020-02-04
pl
dc.affiliation
Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Filozofii
pl
dc.subtype
Article
pl
dc.rights.original
CC-BY; inne; ostateczna wersja wydawcy; w momencie opublikowania; 0