Say it with images : drawing on Jerome Frank’s ideas on judicial decision making

2019
journal article
article
3
dc.abstract.enThis paper aims to shed light on the putative functions of placing images in judicial opinions from the judges’ perspective. Thus far, commentators have overlooked the functions that images play for judges when used in judicial opinions and consequently have failed to provide a thorough understanding of the process. To help fill this gap, Jerome Frank’s ideas on judging will be presented. The argument goes that using images in judicial opinions can be interpreted as a way to enable the decision-making process to be, as far as possible, devoid of hypocrisy, closer to judicial candor and more open to scrutiny. This notion can be excavated from Frank’s works in light of the existential features of both passing judgments and articulating decision-making processes by and for judges themselves. As will be shown, Frank’s views on judicial decision-making are more original and enlightening than critics might suggest and they are particularly relevant when examining the use of images in judicial opinions from a judge’s perspective.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Socjologii Prawapl
dc.contributor.authorStępień, Mateusz - 132100 pl
dc.date.accession2019-09-27pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T08:07:15Z
dc.date.available2019-10-02T08:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2019pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 334pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.physical321-334pl
dc.description.points100pl
dc.description.publication1,1pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume32pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11196-019-09606-7pl
dc.identifier.eissn1572-8722pl
dc.identifier.issn0952-8059pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/83844
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-019-09606-7pl
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.participationStępień, Mateusz: 100%;pl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeinne
dc.subject.enimages in lawpl
dc.subject.enJerome Frankpl
dc.subject.enjudicial opinionspl
dc.subject.enjudicial hunchpl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleSay it with images : drawing on Jerome Frank’s ideas on judicial decision makingpl
dc.title.journalInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridiquepl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
This paper aims to shed light on the putative functions of placing images in judicial opinions from the judges’ perspective. Thus far, commentators have overlooked the functions that images play for judges when used in judicial opinions and consequently have failed to provide a thorough understanding of the process. To help fill this gap, Jerome Frank’s ideas on judging will be presented. The argument goes that using images in judicial opinions can be interpreted as a way to enable the decision-making process to be, as far as possible, devoid of hypocrisy, closer to judicial candor and more open to scrutiny. This notion can be excavated from Frank’s works in light of the existential features of both passing judgments and articulating decision-making processes by and for judges themselves. As will be shown, Frank’s views on judicial decision-making are more original and enlightening than critics might suggest and they are particularly relevant when examining the use of images in judicial opinions from a judge’s perspective.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Socjologii Prawa
dc.contributor.authorpl
Stępień, Mateusz - 132100
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-09-27
dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-02T08:07:15Z
dc.date.available
2019-10-02T08:07:15Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2019
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 334
dc.description.numberpl
2
dc.description.physicalpl
321-334
dc.description.pointspl
100
dc.description.publicationpl
1,1
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
32
dc.identifier.doipl
10.1007/s11196-019-09606-7
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1572-8722
dc.identifier.issnpl
0952-8059
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/83844
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-019-09606-7
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.participationpl
Stępień, Mateusz: 100%;
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
inne
dc.subject.enpl
images in law
dc.subject.enpl
Jerome Frank
dc.subject.enpl
judicial opinions
dc.subject.enpl
judicial hunch
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Say it with images : drawing on Jerome Frank’s ideas on judicial decision making
dc.title.journalpl
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
14
Views per month
Views per city
Ashburn
4
Dublin
3
Wroclaw
2
Downloads
stepien_say_it_with_images_drawing_on_jerome_franks_ideas_on_judicial_decision_making_2019.pdf
5