Przedawnienie roszczeń odszkodowawczych za straty wynikłe z działań przewidzianych w art. 35 ustawy z dnia 12 marca 1958 r. o zasadach i trybie wywłaszczania nieruchomości

2014
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThere are instances where the transmission company uses someone else's land on the basis of an administrative decision issued pursuant to the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law without the payment of the compensation. The said law is no longer in force but the issue of the limitation of the compensation claims for the loss resulting from the activities covered by the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law is important to the present moment. An administrative decision based on the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law resulted in the restriction of the ownership of the property owner. The decision granted the company the right to set up on someone else's land the networks and transmission facilities and then exploit them freely and enter the ground for the purposes of maintaining the network. Companies obtained the opportunity to carry out business tasks and goals wherein the network and transmission facilities were used. If the rights of the property owner have been limited as a result of the administrative decision referred to in the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law, it results in the obligation to pay the compensation for the benefit of the property owner. The compensation for loss resulting from the activities covered by the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law was established in the agreement concluded between the property owner and the transmission company. In case of a dispute, the compensation could only be determined by an administrative decision. The property owner has the right to demand compensation from any loss related to the construction of the transmission network and its various devices on its real property, including the reduction in the value of this property. The compensation relation resulting from issuing the expropriation decision including the decision based on the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law has a civil law nature. The admissibility of the limitation of the compensation claims should be acknowledged. The compensation claim is exhausted not only in the demand of its payment, but may take the form of the request for its determination and payment. The compensation claim cannot be limited before its creation, i.e. before its determination. The limitation period of the claim shall run from the date on which the claim is due and the claims for compensation determined by an administrative decision shall become due until after their determination and assignment. The limitation period for the compensation claim in the light of the Article 118 of the Civil Code is 10 years old and runs from the date on which the compensation has been determined. The administrative decision is not the source of the compensation claim but the claim arises ex lege. The court proceedings referring to the compensation issue is inadmissible. The Article 129 (5) of the Act on the real property management may be applied to the facts occurring before the date of this law coming into force and formed pursuant to the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law. The best solution of any doubt referring to the nature and admissibility of the limitation of the compensation claims and the possibilities of applying the Article 129 (5) of the Act on the real property management to the facts occurring before this law's entrance into force would be the legislator's interference regulating the above issues. Therefore, position presented above may be interpreted as de lege ferenda conclusion.pl
dc.contributor.authorPtak, Jarosławpl
dc.date.accession2019-10-12pl
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-12T08:16:29Z
dc.date.available2019-10-12T08:16:29Z
dc.date.issued2014pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical51-63pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/0fzp-3269pl
dc.identifier.issn1641-1609pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84813
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/tpp_1-2014_ptak.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titlePrzedawnienie roszczeń odszkodowawczych za straty wynikłe z działań przewidzianych w art. 35 ustawy z dnia 12 marca 1958 r. o zasadach i trybie wywłaszczania nieruchomościpl
dc.title.alternativeThe limitation of the compensation claims for the loss resulting from activities covered by the Article 35 of the Act from 12 March 1958 on the principles and procedures of the real property expropriation (the "Expropriation Law")pl
dc.title.journalTransformacje Prawa Prywatnegopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
There are instances where the transmission company uses someone else's land on the basis of an administrative decision issued pursuant to the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law without the payment of the compensation. The said law is no longer in force but the issue of the limitation of the compensation claims for the loss resulting from the activities covered by the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law is important to the present moment. An administrative decision based on the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law resulted in the restriction of the ownership of the property owner. The decision granted the company the right to set up on someone else's land the networks and transmission facilities and then exploit them freely and enter the ground for the purposes of maintaining the network. Companies obtained the opportunity to carry out business tasks and goals wherein the network and transmission facilities were used. If the rights of the property owner have been limited as a result of the administrative decision referred to in the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law, it results in the obligation to pay the compensation for the benefit of the property owner. The compensation for loss resulting from the activities covered by the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law was established in the agreement concluded between the property owner and the transmission company. In case of a dispute, the compensation could only be determined by an administrative decision. The property owner has the right to demand compensation from any loss related to the construction of the transmission network and its various devices on its real property, including the reduction in the value of this property. The compensation relation resulting from issuing the expropriation decision including the decision based on the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law has a civil law nature. The admissibility of the limitation of the compensation claims should be acknowledged. The compensation claim is exhausted not only in the demand of its payment, but may take the form of the request for its determination and payment. The compensation claim cannot be limited before its creation, i.e. before its determination. The limitation period of the claim shall run from the date on which the claim is due and the claims for compensation determined by an administrative decision shall become due until after their determination and assignment. The limitation period for the compensation claim in the light of the Article 118 of the Civil Code is 10 years old and runs from the date on which the compensation has been determined. The administrative decision is not the source of the compensation claim but the claim arises ex lege. The court proceedings referring to the compensation issue is inadmissible. The Article 129 (5) of the Act on the real property management may be applied to the facts occurring before the date of this law coming into force and formed pursuant to the Article 35 of the Expropriation Law. The best solution of any doubt referring to the nature and admissibility of the limitation of the compensation claims and the possibilities of applying the Article 129 (5) of the Act on the real property management to the facts occurring before this law's entrance into force would be the legislator's interference regulating the above issues. Therefore, position presented above may be interpreted as de lege ferenda conclusion.
dc.contributor.authorpl
Ptak, Jarosław
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-10-12
dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-12T08:16:29Z
dc.date.available
2019-10-12T08:16:29Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2014
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
51-63
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/0fzp-3269
dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/84813
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/tpp_1-2014_ptak.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Przedawnienie roszczeń odszkodowawczych za straty wynikłe z działań przewidzianych w art. 35 ustawy z dnia 12 marca 1958 r. o zasadach i trybie wywłaszczania nieruchomości
dc.title.alternativepl
The limitation of the compensation claims for the loss resulting from activities covered by the Article 35 of the Act from 12 March 1958 on the principles and procedures of the real property expropriation (the "Expropriation Law")
dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
36
Views per month
Views per city
Ashburn
11
Dublin
3
Council Bluffs
2
San Jose
2
Wroclaw
2
Brussels
1
Chandler
1
Shanghai
1
Zboiska
1
Świnoujście
1
Downloads
ptak_przedawnienie_roszczen_odszkodowawczych_za_straty_2014.pdf
18