Ormianie polscy czy ukraińscy? : o sposobie pisania historii Ormian na ziemiach dzisiejszej Ukrainy Zachodniej

2010
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enContemporary Ukrainian historiography consistently applies the term Ukrainian Armenians in its description of the Armenians of the former Polish Kingdom, subsequently Galicia, and ultimately the eastern provinces (województwo) of interwar Poland. Equally in the international literature on the subject this designation competes with the traditional name for this group that had earlier been used widely and to this day is still current in Polish historiography. This being: Armenians in Poland, or Polish Armenians, something that also reflects the traditional designation in Armenian itself - Lehahayer. The Polish historiographic tradition is in accordance with the tradition of the group itself. Its eminent chroniclers (Franciszek Zachariasiewicz, Sadok Barącz) have perceived their history through the prism of contacts with Poland. The term Ukrainian Armenians started to be widely applied following the inclusion of these areas within the composition of Soviet Ukraine, in which the former Armenian settlement had been concentrated (1939, 1944). This refers to the actual nationality and falsifies historical reality. This onomastic treatment was especially propagated by Jaroslav R. Dashkevych. This Ukrainian historian was responsible on the one hand for greatly enhancing knowledge about the history of Polish Armenians though equally on the other hand, his Ukrainian patriotism and conviction as to the rights of Ukrainians to the lands of former Eastern Galicia meant that he strove to prove theses on the insignificance of the Polish state in the history of the Armenian diaspora, on conflicts between Armenians and Poles, the persecution of the latter by Poland and their natural alliance with the Ukrainian people. Yet at this time when the Armenians settled in the Polish Kingdom (the 14th to the 18th centuries) the Ukraine as a state, and even as an idea did not exist and the Kingdom was to be their place of refuge, point of reference and an important factor conditioning economic and cultural development. The Polish authorities were the issuers of the privileges that enabled the maintaining of group identity, the creation of parish and church organisations, the preservation of their own legal system. Nothing is known - besides hypotheses - as to the analogical guarantees from pre-Polish times i.e. Ruthenian. The relations between Armenians and Ruthenians (the term Ukrainian becoming only widely used towards the end of the 19th century) were complex and frequently encumbered with the imprint of competition as well as conflict. It is enough to state that the creator of the concept of a separate Ukrainian Ruthenian state, Bohdan Chmielnicki, the leader of the Cossack uprising against Poland (1648), carried out massacres of all those ethnic groupings associated with the Polish state. Besides the killing of the gentry, the Catholic clergy and Jews, he murdered also Armenians. A similar fate was to befall and unite Poles and Armenians during the Second World War when they fell victim to organised killings at the hands of Ukrainian nationalists (1943-1945). Indisputable is also the final direction in the acculturation of Armenians. Together with integration into Polish society - to a large degree with its elites (the gentry) - they adopted Polish as a language, cultivated a sense of loyalty towards their new homeland, and when travelling abroad would present themselves as Lehc‛ik‛, in other words as Poles. Here one could enumerate many members of the clergy and in particular the figure of Simeon Lehac‛i, one of the best known intellectuals of this group from the 17th century. The exceptionally strong material footing of Armenians in Poland, the result of an almost total monopolization of Poland’s trade with the Orient, manifested itself in the form of influence exerted on the significant cultural change referred to as the Orientalization of Polish culture in the period from the 16th to the 17th century. Group memory blotted out episodes of conflict and created an extremely strong myth of Poland as a second homeland, which meant that Armenians resettled alongside Poles within the new borders of the post-1945 state, while their contemporary activists keenly strive to regain the right to their history and reject the Ukrainian historiographic usurpation of their past.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Historyczny : Instytut Historiipl
dc.contributor.authorStopka, Krzysztof - 132118 pl
dc.date.accession2021-07-27pl
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T08:41:02Z
dc.date.available2021-07-27T08:41:02Z
dc.date.issued2010pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical149-174pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.eissn2449-870Xpl
dc.identifier.issn2082-6184pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/276527
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lehahayer/article/view/2441pl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleOrmianie polscy czy ukraińscy? : o sposobie pisania historii Ormian na ziemiach dzisiejszej Ukrainy Zachodniejpl
dc.title.alternativePolish or Ukrainian Armenians? : on the means of recording the history of Armenians settled in the territories of the present-day Western Ukrainepl
dc.title.journalLehahayerpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
Contemporary Ukrainian historiography consistently applies the term Ukrainian Armenians in its description of the Armenians of the former Polish Kingdom, subsequently Galicia, and ultimately the eastern provinces (województwo) of interwar Poland. Equally in the international literature on the subject this designation competes with the traditional name for this group that had earlier been used widely and to this day is still current in Polish historiography. This being: Armenians in Poland, or Polish Armenians, something that also reflects the traditional designation in Armenian itself - Lehahayer. The Polish historiographic tradition is in accordance with the tradition of the group itself. Its eminent chroniclers (Franciszek Zachariasiewicz, Sadok Barącz) have perceived their history through the prism of contacts with Poland. The term Ukrainian Armenians started to be widely applied following the inclusion of these areas within the composition of Soviet Ukraine, in which the former Armenian settlement had been concentrated (1939, 1944). This refers to the actual nationality and falsifies historical reality. This onomastic treatment was especially propagated by Jaroslav R. Dashkevych. This Ukrainian historian was responsible on the one hand for greatly enhancing knowledge about the history of Polish Armenians though equally on the other hand, his Ukrainian patriotism and conviction as to the rights of Ukrainians to the lands of former Eastern Galicia meant that he strove to prove theses on the insignificance of the Polish state in the history of the Armenian diaspora, on conflicts between Armenians and Poles, the persecution of the latter by Poland and their natural alliance with the Ukrainian people. Yet at this time when the Armenians settled in the Polish Kingdom (the 14th to the 18th centuries) the Ukraine as a state, and even as an idea did not exist and the Kingdom was to be their place of refuge, point of reference and an important factor conditioning economic and cultural development. The Polish authorities were the issuers of the privileges that enabled the maintaining of group identity, the creation of parish and church organisations, the preservation of their own legal system. Nothing is known - besides hypotheses - as to the analogical guarantees from pre-Polish times i.e. Ruthenian. The relations between Armenians and Ruthenians (the term Ukrainian becoming only widely used towards the end of the 19th century) were complex and frequently encumbered with the imprint of competition as well as conflict. It is enough to state that the creator of the concept of a separate Ukrainian Ruthenian state, Bohdan Chmielnicki, the leader of the Cossack uprising against Poland (1648), carried out massacres of all those ethnic groupings associated with the Polish state. Besides the killing of the gentry, the Catholic clergy and Jews, he murdered also Armenians. A similar fate was to befall and unite Poles and Armenians during the Second World War when they fell victim to organised killings at the hands of Ukrainian nationalists (1943-1945). Indisputable is also the final direction in the acculturation of Armenians. Together with integration into Polish society - to a large degree with its elites (the gentry) - they adopted Polish as a language, cultivated a sense of loyalty towards their new homeland, and when travelling abroad would present themselves as Lehc‛ik‛, in other words as Poles. Here one could enumerate many members of the clergy and in particular the figure of Simeon Lehac‛i, one of the best known intellectuals of this group from the 17th century. The exceptionally strong material footing of Armenians in Poland, the result of an almost total monopolization of Poland’s trade with the Orient, manifested itself in the form of influence exerted on the significant cultural change referred to as the Orientalization of Polish culture in the period from the 16th to the 17th century. Group memory blotted out episodes of conflict and created an extremely strong myth of Poland as a second homeland, which meant that Armenians resettled alongside Poles within the new borders of the post-1945 state, while their contemporary activists keenly strive to regain the right to their history and reject the Ukrainian historiographic usurpation of their past.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Historyczny : Instytut Historii
dc.contributor.authorpl
Stopka, Krzysztof - 132118
dc.date.accessionpl
2021-07-27
dc.date.accessioned
2021-07-27T08:41:02Z
dc.date.available
2021-07-27T08:41:02Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2010
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
149-174
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.eissnpl
2449-870X
dc.identifier.issnpl
2082-6184
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / OP
dc.identifier.uri
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/276527
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
https://journals.akademicka.pl/lehahayer/article/view/2441
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Ormianie polscy czy ukraińscy? : o sposobie pisania historii Ormian na ziemiach dzisiejszej Ukrainy Zachodniej
dc.title.alternativepl
Polish or Ukrainian Armenians? : on the means of recording the history of Armenians settled in the territories of the present-day Western Ukraine
dc.title.journalpl
Lehahayer
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
37
Views per month
Views per city
Dublin
9
New York
6
Wroclaw
4
Lomé
2
Torun
2
Brussels
1
Chandler
1
Krakow
1
San Jose
1
Warsaw
1
Downloads
stopka_ormianie_polscy_czy_ukrainscy_2010.odt
23
stopka_ormianie_polscy_czy_ukrainscy_2010.pdf
11