O potrzebie reformy przepisów regulujących stosunki majątkowe między małżonkami

2012
journal article
article
dc.abstract.enThe paper analyzes the provisions pertaining to the matrimonial property relations in the Polish Family and Guardianship Code of 25 February 1964 (hereinafter referred to, after its Polish acronym, as "KR iO"), as amended by the Act of 17 July 2004. Several amendments introduced by the above-mentioned Act should be regarded as controversial, or in some instances, even as defective. Notwithstanding the introduction of a definition of the acts of the management of joint matrimonial property in Article 36 § 2 of KR iO, there continues to be a tendency in the legal literature to interpret this definition broadly. As defective should be considered the regulation that requires consent of the other spouse for the acquisition of property rights against consideration (Art. 37 § 1 points 1-3 of KR iO), the deprivation of the spouse who does not conduct professional or economic activity of the possibility to perform the management acts in relation to items used for carrying out such activities (Art. 36 § 3 of KR iO), as well as exclusion of liability with the joint matrimonial property as to all obligations not arising from acts in law (Art. 41 § 1 KR iO), including such obligations that result in the increase of the value of the joint matrimonial property and alimony liabilities. Moreover, the regulation of the matrimonial property relations adopted in the provisions of the KR iO results in their inconsistency with the provisions of the Polish Civil Code, what in some instances undermines the principle of the real performance of obligations. A spouse, who individually undertakes an act of management of joint matrimonial property, sometimes faces more restrictions with respect to effective performance of acts in law compared to a person who has no rights to items belonging to that property. For these very reasons, a new discussion should begin, both about the method of regulation of the acts of management of the joint matrimonial property, as well as the liability with such property for liabilities of one of the spouses.pl
dc.affiliationWydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Prawa Cywilnegopl
dc.contributor.authorPisuliński, Jerzy - 131428 pl
dc.date.accession2016-05-05pl
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-06T10:07:42Z
dc.date.available2016-05-06T10:07:42Z
dc.date.issued2012pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalStreszcz. ang. s. 218-219pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.physical195-219pl
dc.description.points5pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/q80s-j134pl
dc.identifier.issn1641-1609pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / Ppl
dc.identifier.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/25037
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/tpp_2-2012_pisulinski.pdfpl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek utworów chronionych*
dc.rights.licenceOTHER
dc.rights.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.plprawo rodzinnepl
dc.subject.plstosunki majątkowepl
dc.subject.plmałżonkowiepl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleO potrzebie reformy przepisów regulujących stosunki majątkowe między małżonkamipl
dc.title.alternativeAbout the necessity of reform of provisions regulating the matrimonial property regimepl
dc.title.journalTransformacje Prawa Prywatnegopl
dc.title.volumeZeszyt jubileuszowy dla pani profesor Janiny Preussner-Zamorskiejpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
dc.abstract.enpl
The paper analyzes the provisions pertaining to the matrimonial property relations in the Polish Family and Guardianship Code of 25 February 1964 (hereinafter referred to, after its Polish acronym, as "KR iO"), as amended by the Act of 17 July 2004. Several amendments introduced by the above-mentioned Act should be regarded as controversial, or in some instances, even as defective. Notwithstanding the introduction of a definition of the acts of the management of joint matrimonial property in Article 36 § 2 of KR iO, there continues to be a tendency in the legal literature to interpret this definition broadly. As defective should be considered the regulation that requires consent of the other spouse for the acquisition of property rights against consideration (Art. 37 § 1 points 1-3 of KR iO), the deprivation of the spouse who does not conduct professional or economic activity of the possibility to perform the management acts in relation to items used for carrying out such activities (Art. 36 § 3 of KR iO), as well as exclusion of liability with the joint matrimonial property as to all obligations not arising from acts in law (Art. 41 § 1 KR iO), including such obligations that result in the increase of the value of the joint matrimonial property and alimony liabilities. Moreover, the regulation of the matrimonial property relations adopted in the provisions of the KR iO results in their inconsistency with the provisions of the Polish Civil Code, what in some instances undermines the principle of the real performance of obligations. A spouse, who individually undertakes an act of management of joint matrimonial property, sometimes faces more restrictions with respect to effective performance of acts in law compared to a person who has no rights to items belonging to that property. For these very reasons, a new discussion should begin, both about the method of regulation of the acts of management of the joint matrimonial property, as well as the liability with such property for liabilities of one of the spouses.
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Prawa i Administracji : Katedra Prawa Cywilnego
dc.contributor.authorpl
Pisuliński, Jerzy - 131428
dc.date.accessionpl
2016-05-05
dc.date.accessioned
2016-05-06T10:07:42Z
dc.date.available
2016-05-06T10:07:42Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2012
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Streszcz. ang. s. 218-219
dc.description.numberpl
2
dc.description.physicalpl
195-219
dc.description.pointspl
5
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.identifier.doipl
10.26106/q80s-j134
dc.identifier.issnpl
1641-1609
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / P
dc.identifier.uri
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/25037
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://www.transformacje.pl/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/tpp_2-2012_pisulinski.pdf
dc.languagepl
pol
dc.language.containerpl
pol
dc.rights*
Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych
dc.rights.licence
OTHER
dc.rights.uri*
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.plpl
prawo rodzinne
dc.subject.plpl
stosunki majątkowe
dc.subject.plpl
małżonkowie
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
O potrzebie reformy przepisów regulujących stosunki majątkowe między małżonkami
dc.title.alternativepl
About the necessity of reform of provisions regulating the matrimonial property regime
dc.title.journalpl
Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego
dc.title.volumepl
Zeszyt jubileuszowy dla pani profesor Janiny Preussner-Zamorskiej
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
10
Views per month
Views per city
Krakow
3
San Jose
2
Warsaw
2
Ashburn
1
Downloads
pisulinski_o_potrzebie_reformy_przepisow_regulujacych_stosunki_2012.pdf
22
pisulinski_o_potrzebie_reformy_przepisow_regulujacych_stosunki_2012.odt
2