Bibliogr. s. 390-391

BACKGROUND: To distinguish RCC subtypes based on contrast enhancement features of CT images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 59 lesions from 57 patients were included. All patients underwent multi-slice CT imaging with a triphasic protocol, which included non-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and urographic phases. Contrast enhancement features of renal masses were evaluated in terms of CT attenuation values (AV) and differences in contrast density; the aorta or renal parenchyma were evaluated based on corrected or relative values. RESULTS: Clear cell RCC (ccRCC) showed more intense contrast enhancement than other RCC subtypes. When differentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes, a cut-off AV of 86-89 HU, aorta-based corrected AV of 89-95 HU and renal parenchyma-based corrected AV of 87-95 HU showed a diagnostic accuracy of 81-86%, 86-88% and 74-78%, respectively, in the corticomedullary phase. Furthermore, a cutoff of 2.42-2.72 for the relative contrast enhancement ratio, a cutoff of 2.59-2.74 for the aorta-based corrected relative contrast enhancement ratio and a cutoff of 2.63-2.76 for the renal parenchyma-based attenuation ratio showed a diagnostic accuracy of 83-88%, 88-90% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable parameters for differentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes are aorta-based corrected AV and aorta-based corrected relative contrast enhancement values in the corticomedullary phase.