Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis
endosymbiosis
population
relativity
transitions
If there is a single discipline of science calling the basic concepts of biology into question, it is without doubt microbiology. Indeed, developments in microbiology have recently forced us to rethink such fundamental concepts as the organism, individual, and genome. In this paper I show how microorganisms are changing our understanding of natural aggregations and develop the concept of a Darwinian population to embrace these discoveries. I start by showing that it is hard to set the boundaries of a Darwinian population, and I suggest thinking of a Darwinian population as a relative property of a Darwinian individual. Then I argue, in contrast to the commonly held view, that Darwinian populations are multispecies units, and that in order to accept the multispecies account of Darwinian populations we have to separate fitness from natural selection. Finally, I show how all these ideas provide a theoretical framework leading to a more precise understanding of the ecology of endosymbiosis than is afforded by poetic metaphors such as "slavery".
dc.abstract.en | If there is a single discipline of science calling the basic concepts of biology into question, it is without doubt microbiology. Indeed, developments in microbiology have recently forced us to rethink such fundamental concepts as the organism, individual, and genome. In this paper I show how microorganisms are changing our understanding of natural aggregations and develop the concept of a Darwinian population to embrace these discoveries. I start by showing that it is hard to set the boundaries of a Darwinian population, and I suggest thinking of a Darwinian population as a relative property of a Darwinian individual. Then I argue, in contrast to the commonly held view, that Darwinian populations are multispecies units, and that in order to accept the multispecies account of Darwinian populations we have to separate fitness from natural selection. Finally, I show how all these ideas provide a theoretical framework leading to a more precise understanding of the ecology of endosymbiosis than is afforded by poetic metaphors such as "slavery". | pl |
dc.affiliation | Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Filozofii | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Stencel, Adrian - 222688 | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-15T14:58:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-15T14:58:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.number | 5 | pl |
dc.description.physical | 619-637 | pl |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 31 | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10539-016-9531-5 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-8404 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-3867 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / P | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/38110 | |
dc.language | eng | pl |
dc.language.container | eng | pl |
dc.rights | Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa | * |
dc.rights.licence | CC-BY | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl | * |
dc.share.type | inne | |
dc.subject.en | endosymbiosis | pl |
dc.subject.en | population | pl |
dc.subject.en | relativity | pl |
dc.subject.en | transitions | pl |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis | pl |
dc.title.journal | Biology & Philosophy | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
2
Views per month
Views per city
Downloads
Open Access